Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27635350›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Epidemiology of Salmonella sp. in California cull dairy cattle: prevalence of fecal shedding and diagnostic accuracy of pooled enriched broth culture of fecal samples.

Omran A Abu Aboud, John M Adaska, Deniece R Williams, Paul V Rossitto, John D Champagne, Terry W Lehenbauer, Robert Atwill, Xunde Li, Sharif S Aly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Outbreak of Multidrug-ResistantFoodborne pathogens and disease · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. An Abattoir-Based Study on the Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Omran A Abu AboudSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, University of California, Davis , Tulare, California , United States.
John M AdaskaCalifornia Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory , Tulare, California , United States.
Deniece R WilliamsSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, University of California, Davis , Tulare, California , United States.
Paul V RossittoSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, University of California, Davis , Tulare, California , United States.
John D ChampagneSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, University of California, Davis , Tulare, California , United States.
Terry W LehenbauerSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, University of California, Davis, Tulare, California, United States; Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, California, United States.
Robert AtwillDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, California, United States; Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis, California, United States.
Xunde LiDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, California, United States; Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis, California, United States.
Sharif S AlySchool of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, University of California, Davis, Tulare, California, United States; Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, California, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary objective of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the crude, seasonal and cull-reason stratified prevalence of Salmonella fecal shedding in cull dairy cattle on seven California dairies. A secondary objective was to estimate and compare the relative sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for pools of 5 and 10 enriched broth cultures of fecal samples for Salmonella sp. detection.

methodsSeven dairy farms located in the San Joaquin Valley of California were identified and enrolled in the study as a convenience sample. Cull cows were identified for fecal sampling once during each season between 2014 and 2015, specifically during spring, summer, fall, and winter, and 10 cows were randomly selected for fecal sampling at the day of their sale. In addition, study personnel completed a survey based on responses of the herd manager to questions related to the previous four month's herd management. Fecal samples were frozen until testing for Salmonella. After overnight enrichment in liquid broth, pools of enrichment broth (EBP) were created for 5 and 10 samples. All individual and pooled broths were cultured on selective media with putative Salmonella colonies confirmed by biochemical testing before being serogrouped and serotyped.

resultsA total of 249 cull cows were enrolled into the study and their fecal samples tested for Salmonella. The survey-weighted period prevalence of fecal shedding of all Salmonella sp. in the cull cow samples across all study herds and the entire study period was 3.42% (N = 249; SE 1.07). The within herd prevalence of Salmonella shed in feces did not differ over the four study seasons (P = 0.074). The Se of culture of EBP of five samples was 62.5% (SE = 17.12), which was not statistically different from the Se of culture of EBP of 10 (37.5%, SE = 17.12, P = 0.48). The Sp of culture of EBP of five samples was 95.24% (SE = 3.29) and for pools of 10 samples was 100.00% (SE = 0). There was no statistical difference between the culture relative specificities of EBP of 5 and 10 (P > 0.99). DISCUSSION: Our study showed a numerically higher prevalence of Salmonella shedding in the summer, although the results were not significant, most likely due to a lack of power from the small sample size. A higher prevalence in summer months may be related to heat stress. To detect Salmonella, investigators may expect a 62.5% sensitivity for culture of EBP of five, relative to individual fecal sample enrichment and culture. In contrast, culture of EBP of 10 samples resulted in a numerically lower Se. Culture of EBP of size 5 or 10 samples, given similar prevalence and limit of detection, can be expected to yield specificities of 95 and 100%, respectively.

Indexed as

CaliforniaCull dairy cowsEnriched broth cultureFecal poolingPrevalenceSalmonellaSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID27635350
PMCPMC5012270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.