ArticlePeerJ2016
Reliability and validity of an iPhone(®) application for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion.
Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03658915 (Validity and Reliability of Smartphone Use in Measuring Joint Position Sense in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validity and Reliability of Smartphone Use in Measuring Joint Position Sense in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reliability and validity of clinically accessible smartphone applications to measure joint range of motion: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Is blinding in studies of manual soft tissue mobilisation of the back possible? A feasibility randomised controlled trial with Swiss graduate students.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2024Trial
- Sex-Specific Associations Between Sagittal Spinal Alignment and Postural Control in Recreational Strength-Trained Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable wrapper-based machine learning framework for predicting patellofemoral pain syndrome using minimal clinical tests.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Feasibility of blinding spinal manual therapy interventions among participants and outcome assessors: protocol for a blinding feasibility trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Quantifying lumbar sagittal plane kinematics using a wrist-worn inertial measurement unit.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reliability of the assessment of scapular posterior tilt angle using the smartphone and scapular movement during arm elevation in healthy individuals and patients with frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional study.JSES international · 2023Article
- Relationship of Impaired Lumbar Spine-Hip Coordination During Sit To Stand and Stand To Sit with Functional Disability in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Patients.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2022Article
- Reliability and concurrent validity of mobile health technology for patient self-monitoring in physical rehabilitation.JSES international · 2022Article
- Measuring Lumbar Motion Angle With a Small Accelerometer: A Reliability Study.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2022Article
- Reliability and validity of lower limb joint range of motion measurements using a smartphone.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Normative Reference Values for Trunk Range of Motion and Isometric Muscle Strength in Asymptomatic Young Indian Adults.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Smart Technology and Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Concepts Regarding the Impact of Smartphones and Wearable Technology on Our Patients and Practice.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021Review
- Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Morphology Changes in Patient with Different Degrees of Lumbar Disc Herniation: An Ultrasonographic Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Test-Retest Reliability of an iPhoneInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Telemedicine-Based Pediatric Examination of the Back and Lower Limbs: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2021Review
- Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Individual Cerebral Blood Flow Measured by Quantitative Vessel-Flow Phase-Contrast MRI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Smartphone Applications as a Suitable Alternative to CROM Device and Inclinometers in Assessing the Cervical Range of Motion in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasurement of lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) is often considered to be an essential component of lumbar spine physiotherapy and orthopedic assessment. The measurement can be carried out through various instruments such as inclinometers, goniometers, and etc. Recent smartphones have been equipped with accelerometers and magnetometers, which, through specific software applications (apps) can be used for inclinometric functions. PURPOSE: The main purpose was to investigate the reliability and validity of an iPhone(®) app (TiltMeter(©) -advanced level and inclinometer) for measuring standing lumbar spine flexion-extension ROM in asymptomatic subjects.
designA cross-sectional study was carried out.
settingThis study was conducted in a physiotherapy clinic located at School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Science and Health Services, Tehran, Iran. SUBJECTS: A convenience sample of 30 asymptomatic adults (15 males; 15 females; age range = 18-55 years) was recruited between August 2015 and December 2015.
methodsFollowing a 2-minute warm-up, the subjects were asked to stand in a relaxed position and their skin was marked at the T12-L1 and S1-S2 spinal levels. From this position, they were asked to perform maximum lumbar flexion followed by maximum lumbar extension with their knees straight. Two blinded raters each used an inclinometer and the iPhone (®) app to measure lumbar spine flexion-extension ROM. A third rater read the measured angles. To calculate total lumbar spine flexion-extension ROM, the measurement from S1-S2 was subtracted from T12-L1. The second (2 hours later) and third (48 hours later) sessions were carried out in the same manner as the first session. All of the measurements were conducted 3 times and the mean value of 3 repetitions for each measurement was used for analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) models (3, k) and (2, k) were used to determine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients were used to establish concurrent validity of the iPhone(®) app. Furthermore, minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level (MDC95) was computed as 1.96 × standard error of measurement × [Formula: see text].
resultsGood to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were demonstrated for both the gravity-based inclinometer with ICC values of ≥0.84 and ≥0.77 and the iPhone(®) app with ICC values of ≥0.85 and ≥0.85, respectively. The MDC95 ranged from 5.82°to 8.18°for the intra-rater analysis and from 7.38°to 8.66° for the inter-rater analysis. The concurrent validity for flexion and extension between the 2 instruments was 0.85 and 0.91, respectively.
conclusionsThe iPhone(®)app possesses good to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity. It seems that the iPhone(®) app can be used for the measurement of lumbar spine flexion-extension ROM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.