Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27635321›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

A heritability-based comparison of methods used to cluster 16S rRNA gene sequences into operational taxonomic units.

Matthew A Jackson, Jordana T Bell, Tim D Spector, Claire J Steves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ThePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew A JacksonDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, University of London , London , United Kingdom.
Jordana T BellDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, University of London , London , United Kingdom.
Tim D SpectorDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, University of London , London , United Kingdom.
Claire J StevesDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, University of London , London , United Kingdom.

Funding

Genetic Transmission of Components of the Human Gut MicrobiomeR01DK093595 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, LEY, RUTH EMILY · 2011 to 2020
$3.5M
Development of immunization strategies to reshape pathogenic microbiomesDP2OD007444 · OD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LEY, RUTH EMILY · 2010 to 2010
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK093595NIH HHS DP2 OD007444Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of methods are available to collapse 16S rRNA gene sequencing reads to the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) used in microbiome analyses. A number of studies have aimed to compare the quality of the resulting OTUs. However, in the absence of a standard method to define and enumerate the different taxa within a microbial community, existing comparisons have been unable to compare the ability of clustering methods to generate units that accurately represent functional taxonomic segregation. We have previously demonstrated heritability of the microbiome and we propose this as a measure of each methods' ability to generate OTUs representing biologically relevant units. Our approach assumes that OTUs that best represent the functional units interacting with the hosts' properties will produce the highest heritability estimates. Using 1,750 unselected individuals from the TwinsUK cohort, we compared 11 approaches to OTU clustering in heritability analyses. We find that de novo clustering methods produce more heritable OTUs than reference based approaches, with VSEARCH and SUMACLUST performing well. We also show that differences resulting from each clustering method are minimal once reads are collapsed by taxonomic assignment, although sample diversity estimates are clearly influenced by OTU clustering approach. These results should help the selection of sequence clustering methods in future microbiome studies, particularly for studies of human host-microbiome interactions.

Indexed as

Computational biologyEcologyMicrobiology

Identifiers

PMID27635321
PMCPMC5012273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.