Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27635252›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2016

Reliability and validity of daily physical activity measures during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

Dominik Zbogar, Janice J Eng, William C Miller, Andrei V Krassioukov, Mary C Verrier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dominik ZbogarRehabilitation Research Lab, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Janice J EngRehabilitation Research Lab, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
William C MillerThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Andrei V KrassioukovInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mary C VerrierDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the test-retest reliability and convergent validity of daily physical activity measures during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

designObservational study.

settingTwo inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation centres. SUBJECTS: Participants (n = 106) were recruited from consecutive admissions to rehabilitation.

methodsPhysical activity during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation stay was recorded on two days via (1) wrist accelerometer, (2) hip accelerometer if ambulatory, and (3) self-report (Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury questionnaire). Spearman's correlations and Bland-Altman plots were utilized for test-retest reliability. Correlations between physical activity measures and clinical measures (functional independence, hand function, and ambulation) were performed.

resultsCorrelations for physical activity measures between Day 1 and Day 2 were moderate to high (ρ = 0.53-0.89). Bland-Altman plots showed minimal bias and more within-subject differences in more active individuals and wide limits of agreement. None of these three physical activity measures correlated with one another. A moderate correlation was found between wrist accelerometry counts and grip strength (ρ = 0.58) and between step counts and measures of ambulation (ρ = 0.62). Functional independence was related to wrist accelerometry (ρ = 0.70) and step counts (ρ = 0.56), but not with self-report.

conclusionThe test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the instrumented measures suggest that wrist and hip accelerometers are appropriate tools for use in research studies of daily physical activity in the spinal cord injury rehabilitation setting but are too variable for individual use.

Indexed as

accelerometryrehabilitationreliabilityself-reported physical activitySpinal cord injurystep countsvalidity

Identifiers

PMID27635252
PMCPMC5011392
OpenAlexW2511532275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.