Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27635043›Full record

ArticleCancer research2016

Enhanced Survival with Implantable Scaffolds That Capture Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells In Vivo.

Shreyas S Rao, Grace G Bushnell, Samira M Azarin, Graham Spicer, Brian A Aguado, Jenna R Stoehr, Eric J Jiang, Vadim Backman, Lonnie D Shea, Jacqueline S Jeruss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antigen-conjugated scaffolds enable sustained delivery of antigen and enrichment of antigen-specific T-cells.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Engineered immunological niche directs therapeutic development in models of progressive multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. How much do we know about the metastatic process?Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shreyas S RaoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Grace G BushnellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Samira M AzarinDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Graham SpicerDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Brian A AguadoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.
Jenna R StoehrWeinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Eric J JiangDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Vadim BackmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Lonnie D SheaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. ldshea@umich.edu jjeruss@med.umich.edu.
Jacqueline S JerussDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. ldshea@umich.edu jjeruss@med.umich.edu.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Tumor Environment and Metastasis (TEAM) Research ProgramP30CA060553 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Daniela E Matei · 1993 to 2026
$153.9M
An in vivo metastasis sensorR01CA173745 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BACKMAN, VADIM, SHEA, LONNIE D · 2012 to 2016
$4.2M
Protein-Releasing Microporous Scaffolds for Cell Replacement TherapyR01EB009910 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUO, XUNRONG, SHEA, LONNIE D · 2010 to 2018
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA060553NCI NIH HHS R01 CA173745NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The onset of distant organ metastasis from primary breast cancer marks the transition to a stage IV diagnosis. Standard imaging modalities often detect distant metastasis when the burden of disease is high, underscoring the need for improved methods of detection to allow for interventions that would impede disease progression. Here, microporous poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds were developed that capture early metastatic cells and thus serve as a sentinel for early detection. These scaffolds were used to characterize the dynamic immune response to the implant spanning the acute and chronic foreign body response. The immune cell composition had stabilized at the scaffold after approximately 1 month and changed dramatically within days to weeks after tumor inoculation, with CD11b(+)Gr1(hi)Ly6C(-) cells having the greatest increase in abundance. Implanted scaffolds recruited metastatic cancer cells that were inoculated into the mammary fat pad in vivo, which also significantly reduced tumor burden in the liver and brain. Additionally, cancer cells could be detected using a label-free imaging modality termed inverse spectroscopic optical coherence tomography, and we tested the hypothesis that subsequent removal of the primary tumor after early detection would enhance survival. Surgical removal of the primary tumor following cancer cell detection in the scaffold significantly improved disease-specific survival. The enhanced disease-specific survival was associated with a systemic reduction in the CD11b(+)Gr1(hi)Ly6C(-) cells as a consequence of the implant, which was further supported by Gr-1 depletion studies. Implementation of the scaffold may provide diagnostic and therapeutic options for cancer patients in both the high-risk and adjuvant treatment settings. Cancer Res; 76(18); 5209-18. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFlow CytometryMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDNeoplasm MetastasisPolyestersTomography, Optical CoherencepolycaprolactonePolyesters

Identifiers

PMID27635043
PMCPMC5027988
OpenAlexW2520438285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.