Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27634907›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2016

Prognostic and clinicopathological value of Gli-1 expression in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.

Li Lu, Menglin Wu, Feixiang Zhao, Weihua Fu, Weidong Li, Xue Li, Tong Liu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Prognostic Value of the Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Cells · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Li LuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Menglin WuDepartment of Radiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin, China.
Feixiang ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin, China.
Weihua FuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Weidong LiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xue LiDepartment of Radiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin, China.
Tong LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioma associated oncogene-1 (Gli-1) is considered as a strong positive activator of downstream target genes of hedgehog signal pathway in mammalians. However, its diagnostic and prognostic value in gastric cancer remains unclear and controversial. Therefore, a quantitative meta-analysis was conducted to determine the clinical value of Gli-1 in gastric cancer patients. Twelve eligible articles with 886 gastric cancer patients were included in this meta-analysis. The relationship between Gli-1 expression in gastric cancer patients and clinicopathological features and 5-year overall survival (OS) was evaluated using pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The meta-analysis showed that the upregulated Gli-1 was associated with sample type (gastric cancer tissues) (OR 10.31, 95%CI 7.14-14.88; P = 0.000), differentiation type (OR 3.76, 95%CI 2.55-5.53; P = 0.000), depth of invasion (OR 8.17, 95%CI 3.60-18.55; P = 0.000), lymph node metastasis (OR 3.97, 95%CI 2.73-5.78; P = 0.000) and high TNM stage (OR 3.65, 95%CI 1.89-7.04; P = 0.000). Three studies including 316 patients were assessed for the correlation between Gli-1 and 5-year OS, which indicated that positive Gli-1 expression was associated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients (HR 2.14, 95%CI 1.35-3.40; P = 0.001). Little publication bias was identified by funnel plots and Egger's tests. The sensitivity analysis indicated that no study substantially influenced pooled OR/HR. Taken together, Gli-1 is a credible indicator for highly aggressive tumor with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleOdds RatioPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSignal TransductionStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeZinc Finger Protein GLI1Biomarkers, TumorGLI1 protein, humanZinc Finger Protein GLI1gastric cancerGli-1prognosis

Identifiers

PMID27634907
PMCPMC5356614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.