Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27634897›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Heterozygous mutation of cysteine528 in XPO1 is sufficient for resistance to selective inhibitors of nuclear export.

Jasper Edgar Neggers, Els Vanstreels, Erkan Baloglu, Sharon Shacham, Yosef Landesman, Dirk Daelemans

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Selinexor in Recurrent Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  2. Selective Inhibition of Nuclear Export With Oral Selinexor for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Treatment of multiple myeloma with selinexor: a review.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasper Edgar NeggersKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
Els VanstreelsKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
Erkan BalogluKaryopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, USA.
Sharon ShachamKaryopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, USA.
Yosef LandesmanKaryopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, USA.
Dirk DaelemansKatholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
Karyopharm Therapeutics (United States) · USKU Leuven · BERega Institute for Medical Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exportin-1 (CRM1/XPO1) is a crucial nuclear export protein that transports a wide variety of proteins from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. These cargo proteins include tumor suppressors and growth-regulatory factors and as such XPO1 is considered a potential anti-cancer target. From this perspective, inhibition of the XPO1-mediated nuclear export by selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compounds has shown broad-spectrum anti-cancer activity. Furthermore, the clinical candidate SINE, selinexor, is currently in multiple phase I/II/IIb trials for treatment of cancer. Resistance against selinexor has not yet been observed in the clinic, but in vitro selection of resistance did not reveal any mutations in the target protein, XPO1. However, introduction of a homozygous mutation at the drug's target site, the cysteine 528 residue inside the XPO1 cargo-binding pocket, by genetic engineering, confers resistance to selinexor. Here we investigated whether this resistance to selinexor is recessive or dominant. For this purpose we have engineered multiple leukemia cell lines containing heterozygous or homozygous C528S substitutions using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. Our findings show that heterozygous mutation confers similar resistance against selinexor as homozygous substitution, demonstrating that SINE resistance can be obtained by a single and dominant mutation of the cysteine528 residue in XPO1.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusDrug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsCell SurvivalCRISPR-Cas SystemsCysteineExportin 1 ProteinGene EditingGenetic EngineeringHeterozygoteHL-60 CellsHomozygoteHumansJurkat CellsK562 CellsKaryopherinsAntineoplastic AgentsCysteineExportin 1 ProteinKaryopherinsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearCRISPR/Cas9CRM1nuclear exportSINEXPO1

Identifiers

PMID27634897
PMCPMC5356594
OpenAlexW2520574224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.