Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27634353›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Subnational variation for care at birth in Tanzania: is this explained by place, people, money or drugs?

Corinne E Armstrong, Melisa Martínez-Álvarez, Neha S Singh, Theopista John, Hoviyeh Afnan-Holmes, Chris Grundy, Corrine W Ruktanochai, Josephine Borghi, Moke Magoma, Georgina Msemo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Corinne E ArmstrongCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Melisa Martínez-ÁlvarezCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Neha S SinghCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. neha.singh@lshtm.ac.uk.
Theopista JohnWorld Health Organization, 1 Luthuli Street, PO Box 9292, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hoviyeh Afnan-HolmesCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Chris GrundyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Corrine W RuktanochaiDepartment of Geography & Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Josephine BorghiCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Moke MagomaEvidence for Action, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Georgina MsemoMinistry of Health and Social Welfare, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Zoe MatthewsDivision of Social Statistics and Demography & Centre for Global Health, Population, Poverty and Policy, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK.
Gemini MteiIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Joy E LawnCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTanzania achieved the Millennium Development Goal for child survival, yet made insufficient progress for maternal and neonatal survival and stillbirths, due to low coverage and quality of services for care at birth, with rural women left behind. Our study aimed to evaluate Tanzania's subnational (regional-level) variations for rural care at birth outcomes, i.e., rural women giving birth in a facility and by Caesarean section (C-section), and associations with health systems inputs (financing, health workforce, facilities, and commodities), outputs (readiness and quality of care) and context (education and GDP).

methodsWe undertook correlation analyses of subnational-level associations between health system inputs, outputs, context, and rural care at birth outcomes; and constructed implementation readiness barometers using benchmarks for each health system input indicator. We used geographical information system (GIS) mapping to visualise subnational variations in care at birth for rural women, with a focus on service availability and readiness, and collected qualitative data to investigate financial flows from national to council level to understand variation in financing inputs.

resultsWe found wide subnational variation for rural care at birth outcomes, health systems inputs, and contextual indicators. There was a positive association between rural women giving birth in a facility and by C-section; maternal education; workforce and facility density; and quality of care. There was a negative association between these outcomes and proportion of all births to rural women, total fertility rate, and availability of essential commodities at facilities. Per capita recurrent expenditure was positively associated with facility births (correlation coefficient = 0.43; p = 0.05) but not with C-section. Qualitative results showed that the health financing system is complex and insufficient for providing care at birth services. Bottlenecks for care at birth included low density of health workers, poor availability of essential commodities, and low health financing in Lake and Western Zones.

conclusionsNo region meets the benchmarks for the four health systems building blocks including health finance, health workforce, health facilities, and commodities. Strategies for addressing health system inequities, including overall increases in health expenditure, are needed in rural populations and areas of highest unmet need for family planning to improve coverage of care at birth for rural women in Tanzania.

Indexed as

ParturitionBirth RateFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealthcare FinancingHumansMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyRural PopulationTanzaniaChildbirthHealth financingHealth systemsHealth workforceMaternal healthNewborn healthQuality of careTanzania

Identifiers

PMID27634353
PMCPMC5025821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.