Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27633893›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2016

Central control of interlimb coordination and speed-dependent gait expression in quadrupeds.

Simon M Danner, Simon D Wilshin, Natalia A Shevtsova, Ilya A Rybak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sensory Feedback and Central Neuronal Interactions in Mouse Locomotion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon M DannerDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-7064
Simon D WilshinStructure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, UK.
Natalia A ShevtsovaDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ilya A RybakDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3461-349X
Drexel University · USUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Spinal cord neural circuits for left-right and flexor-extensor coordinationR01NS090919 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI GOULDING, MARTYN D, KIEHN, OLE · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
CRCNS: Rhythm generation in rodent spinal cord R01NS095366 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGHERTY, KIMBERLY J · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
CRCNS: Organization of the locomotor CPG in the rodent spinal cordR01NS081713 · NINDS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS-WARRICK, RONALD M, RYBAK, ILYA A · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081713NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090919NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsQuadrupeds express different gaits depending on speed of locomotion. Central pattern generators (one per limb) within the spinal cord generate locomotor oscillations and control limb movements. Neural interactions between these generators define interlimb coordination and gait. We present a computational model of spinal circuits representing four rhythm generators with left-right excitatory and inhibitory commissural and fore-hind inhibitory interactions within the cord. Increasing brainstem drive to all rhythm generators and excitatory commissural interneurons induces an increasing frequency of locomotor oscillations accompanied by speed-dependent gait changes from walk to trot and to gallop and bound. The model closely reproduces and suggests explanations for multiple experimental data, including speed-dependent gait transitions in intact mice and changes in gait expression in mutants lacking certain types of commissural interneurons. The model suggests the possible circuit organization in the spinal cord and proposes predictions that can be tested experimentally. ABSTRACT: As speed of locomotion is increasing, most quadrupeds, including mice, demonstrate sequential gait transitions from walk to trot and to gallop and bound. The neural mechanisms underlying these transitions are poorly understood. We propose that the speed-dependent expression of different gaits results from speed-dependent changes in the interactions between spinal circuits controlling different limbs and interlimb coordination. As a result, the expression of each gait depends on (1) left-right interactions within the spinal cord mediated by different commissural interneurons (CINs), (2) fore-hind interactions on each side of the spinal cord and (3) brainstem drives to rhythm-generating circuits and CIN pathways. We developed a computational model of spinal circuits consisting of four rhythm generators (RGs) with bilateral left-right interactions mediated by V0 CINs (V0

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsExtremitiesGaitInterneuronsMice, Mutant StrainsSpinal Cordcentral pattern generatorcomputer modellinglimb coordinationlocomotor gaitsspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID27633893
PMCPMC5134391
OpenAlexW2519214224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.