Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27633882›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2016

Combined models for pre- and post-treatment longitudinal biomarker data: an application to CD4 counts in HIV-patients.

Oliver T Stirrup, Abdel G Babiker, Andrew J Copas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Oliver T StirrupMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK. oliver.stirrup.13@ucl.ac.uk.
Abdel G BabikerMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK.
Andrew J CopasMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/21Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been some debate in the literature as to whether baseline values of a measurement of interest at treatment initiation should be treated as an outcome variable as part of a model for longitudinal change or instead used as a predictive variable with respect to the response to treatment. We develop a new approach that involves a combined statistical model for all pre- and post-treatment observations of the biomarker of interest, in which the characteristics of response to treatment are treated as a function of the 'true' value of the biomarker at treatment initiation.

methodsThe modelling strategy developed is applied to a dataset of CD4 counts from patients in the UK Register of HIV Seroconverters (UKR) cohort who initiated highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The post-HAART recovery in CD4 counts for each individual is modelled as following an asymptotic curve in which the speed of response to treatment and long-term maximum are functions of the 'true' underlying CD4 count at initiation of HAART and the time elapsed since seroconversion. Following previous research in this field, the models developed incorporate non-stationary stochastic process components, and the possibility of between-patient differences in variability over time was also considered.

resultsA variety of novel models were successfully fitted to the UKR dataset. These provide reinforcing evidence for findings that have previously been reported in the literature, in particular that there is a strong positive relationship between CD4 count at initiation of HAART and the long-term maximum in each patient, but also reveal potentially important features of the data that would not have been easily identified by other methods of analysis.

conclusionOur proposed methodology provides a unified framework for the analysis of pre- and post-treatment longitudinal biomarker data that will be useful for epidemiological investigations and simulations in this context. The approach developed allows use of all relevant data from observational cohorts in which many patients are missing pre-treatment measurements and in which the timing and number of observations vary widely between patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnti-HIV AgentsBiomarkersCD4 Lymphocyte CountData Interpretation, StatisticalHIV InfectionsHumansLikelihood FunctionsLongitudinal StudiesRegression AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAnti-HIV AgentsBiomarkersCD4HAARTHIVLongitudinal dataMixed effects modelsStatistical methodology

Identifiers

PMID27633882
PMCPMC5025623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.