Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27633877›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2017

A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.

Jun Yin, Rui Qin, Monia Ezzalfani, Daniel J Sargent, Sumithra J Mandrekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Road Map for Designing Phase I Clinical Trials of Radiotherapy-Novel Agent Combinations.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  6. Innovative trial design in precision oncology.Seminars in cancer biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun YinDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 55905, Rochester, MN, U.S.A.
Rui QinDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 55905, Rochester, MN, U.S.A.
Monia EzzalfaniBiostatistics Department, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Daniel J SargentDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 55905, Rochester, MN, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-2684-4741
Sumithra J MandrekarDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 55905, Rochester, MN, U.S.A.

Funding

Methodology for development, validation, and use of novel endpoints in oncologyR01CA174779 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MANDREKAR, SUMITHRA JAY · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase I oncology trials are designed to identify a safe dose with an acceptable toxicity profile. The dose is typically determined based on the probability of severe toxicity observed during the first treatment cycle, although patients continue to receive treatment for multiple cycles. In addition, the toxicity data from multiple types and grades are typically summarized into a single binary outcome of dose-limiting toxicity. A novel endpoint, the total toxicity profile, was previously developed to account for the multiple toxicity types and grades. In this work, we propose to account for longitudinal repeated measures of total toxicity profile over multiple treatment cycles, accounting for cumulative toxicity during dosing-finding. A linear mixed model was utilized in the Bayesian framework, with addition of Bayesian risk functions for decision-making in dose assignment. The performance of this design is evaluated using simulation studies and compared with the previously proposed quasi-likelihood continual reassessment method (QLCRM) design. Twelve clinical scenarios incorporating four different locations of maximum tolerated dose and three different time trends (decreasing, increasing, and no effect) were investigated. The proposed repeated measures design was comparable with the QLCRM when only cycle 1 data were utilized in dose-finding; however, it demonstrated an improvement over the QLCRM when data from multiple cycles were used across all scenarios. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicResearch DesignAntineoplastic AgentsComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agentscontinuous endpointlate and cumulative toxicitylongitudinalmolecularly targeted agentoncologyphase I

Identifiers

PMID27633877
PMCPMC5138146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.