ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2016
Extensive next-generation sequencing analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia at diagnosis: clinical and biological correlations.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expert consensus on the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in Asia.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Article
- Investigation of Chemical Constituents and Antioxidant Activity of Biologically Active Plant-Derived Natural Products.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multiple Mechanisms of NOTCH1 Activation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: NOTCH1 Mutations and Beyond.Cancers · 2022Review
- IGH Translocations in Chinese Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Genetic Profile.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Characterization of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Immunoglobulin Rearrangements from Partial Read Sequencing.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia on Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Driver Mutations and Single Copy Number Abnormalities Identify Binet Stage A Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Aggressive Progression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Role of POT1 in Human Cancer.Cancers · 2020Review
- Recent progress of prognostic biomarkers and risk scoring systems in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Biomarker research · 2020Review
- MYD88 in the driver's seat of B-cell lymphomagenesis: from molecular mechanisms to clinical implications.Haematologica · 2019Review
- Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring with Next-Generation Sequencing Methodologies in Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Review
- Biological significance and prognostic/predictive impact of complex karyotype in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Oncotarget · 2018Review
- Refined karyotype-based prognostic stratification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with a low- and very-low-risk genetic profile.Leukemia · 2018Article
- Next-generation sequencing in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: recent findings and new horizons.Oncotarget · 2017Review
- Article
- Loss of thyroid hormone receptor interactor 13 inhibits cell proliferation and survival in human chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Erratum to: Extensive next-generation sequencing analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia at diagnosis: clinical and biological correlations.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2016Article
- Detection of somatic TP53 mutations and 17p deletions in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a review of the current methods.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis represents a sensitive, reproducible, and resource-efficient technique for routine screening of gene mutations.
methodsWe performed an extensive biologic characterization of newly diagnosed CLL, including NGS analysis of 20 genes frequently mutated in CLL and karyotype analysis to assess whether NGS and karyotype results could be of clinical relevance in the refinement of prognosis and assessment of risk of progression. The genomic DNA from peripheral blood samples of 200 consecutive CLL patients was analyzed using Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine, a NGS platform that uses semiconductor sequencing technology. Karyotype analysis was performed using efficient mitogens.
resultsMutations were detected in 42.0 % of cases with 42.8 % of mutated patients presenting 2 or more mutations. The presence of mutations by NGS was associated with unmutated IGHV gene (p = 0.009), CD38 positivity (p = 0.010), risk stratification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (p < 0.001), and the complex karyotype (p = 0.003). A high risk as assessed by FISH analysis was associated with mutations affecting TP53 (p = 0.012), BIRC3 (p = 0.003), and FBXW7 (p = 0.003) while the complex karyotype was significantly associated with TP53, ATM, and MYD88 mutations (p = 0.003, 0.018, and 0.001, respectively). By multivariate analysis, the multi-hit profile (≥2 mutations by NGS) was independently associated with a shorter time to first treatment (p = 0.004) along with TP53 disruption (p = 0.040), IGHV unmutated status (p < 0.001), and advanced stage (p < 0.001). Advanced stage (p = 0.010), TP53 disruption (p < 0.001), IGHV unmutated status (p = 0.020), and the complex karyotype (p = 0.007) were independently associated with a shorter overall survival.
conclusionsAt diagnosis, an extensive biologic characterization including NGS and karyotype analyses using novel mitogens may offer new perspectives for a better refinement of risk stratification that could be of help in the clinical management of CLL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.