Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27633321›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicology2016

Prenatal mercury exposure and offspring behaviour in childhood and adolescence.

Jean Golding, Steven Gregory, Alan Emond, Yasmin Iles-Caven, Joseph Hibbeln, Caroline M Taylor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean GoldingCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol, UK. Electronic address: jean.golding@bristol.ac.uk.
Steven GregoryCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol, UK.
Alan EmondCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol, UK.
Yasmin Iles-CavenCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol, UK.
Joseph HibbelnNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, USA.
Caroline M TaylorCentre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism · US

Funding

Essential Fatty Acids In Psychiatric DisordersZIAAA000115 · NIAAA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM · PI HIBBELN, JOSEPH · 2009 to 2020
$7.8M
Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Wellcome Trust 102215Wellcome Trust 104077/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is considerable discussion over the possible harm caused by fetal exposure to mercury, but evidence of such harm is contradictory at levels commonly found in populations with moderate intakes of fish. Further information is needed to inform debate and clarify policy recommendations. MATERIAL: Data were collected prospectively for the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Whole blood taken in the first half of pregnancy was assayed for mercury. The outcomes were offspring behavioural assessments collected using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire at seven time points between ages 4 and 16-17 years; five were completed by the mother and two by the teacher. Socioeconomic and biological confounders were first taken into account; further analyses added maternal blood selenium. Separate analyses compared the relationships between prenatal mercury levels and behaviour traits treated as continuous measures in women who ate fish with those who ate no fish in order to determine whether the relationships differed; the hypothesis was that fish consumption had benefits on the brain and masked any mercury effects. In order to prevent Type II errors, the P value for significance was set at 0.10.

resultsPrenatal mercury measurements and offspring behaviour results were available for between 2776 (at 47 months) to 1599 mother-child pairs (at 16-17 years). Even given a P value of 0.10, the number of significant results was no greater than expected apart from the relationships with peer problems at 4, 6 and 10-11 years where the relationships with prenatal mercury were negative (i.e. the greater the level of mercury the fewer the problems the child had with his/her peers). There were no significant differences between the associations with mercury found among the offspring of women who ate fish in pregnancy and those who did not, nor did adjustment for selenium make a difference.

conclusionsThere were no adverse effects of maternal prenatal mercury levels on the behaviour of the offspring. A similar lack of relationship was found when the analyses were confined to those offspring whose mothers had eaten fish in pregnancy, and no consistent differences were found between the fish and non-fish eaters.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAge FactorsAnimalsChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolFemaleFishesFood ContaminationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMaternal ExposureMercuryPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsMercurySeleniumAdolescent behaviourALSPACChild behaviourDietary fishPrenatal mercury exposure

Identifiers

PMID27633321
PMCPMC5138154
OpenAlexW2519070909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.