Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27633245›Full record

ArticleApplied ergonomics2017

Effects of milking unit design on upper extremity muscle activity during attachment among U.S. large-herd parlor workers.

David I Douphrate, David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras, Matthew W Nonnenmann, Robert Hagevoort, Stephen J Reynolds, Anabel Rodriguez, Nathan B Fethke

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied ergonomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David I DouphrateThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, San Antonio Regional Campus, TX, USA. Electronic address: david.i.douphrate@uth.tmc.edu.
David Gimeno Ruiz de PorrasThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, San Antonio Regional Campus, TX, USA.
Matthew W NonnenmannUniversity of Iowa, College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Robert HagevoortNew Mexico State University, Dairy Extension, Clovis, NM, USA.
Stephen J ReynoldsColorado State University, Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Ft. Collins, CO, USA.
Anabel RodriguezThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, San Antonio Regional Campus, TX, USA.
Nathan B FethkeUniversity of Iowa, College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Iowa · USColorado State University · USNew Mexico State University · US

Funding

High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety-RenewalU54OH008085 · OH · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STALLONES, LORANN · 2011 to 2025
$22.2M
ACL HHS U54OH008085NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH008085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-herd dairy parlor workers experience a high prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the upper extremity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of milking unit design on upper extremity muscle activity during milking unit attachment.

methodsUpper extremity muscle activity was recorded among U.S. large-herd parlor workers (n=11) using surface electromyography. Participants performed several milking unit attachment cycles with each of six milking unit designs. Muscle activity levels were then compared between unit designs.

resultsMean muscle activity levels (in %MVE) across milking units ranged from 6.8 to 8.2 for the upper trapezius, 8.2 to 10.3 for the anterior deltoid, 13.8 to 17.2 for the forearm flexors, and 9.9 to 12.4 for the forearm extensors. Pairwise comparisons between milking units did not reveal statistically significant differences in muscle activity levels across milking unit designs. However, a general pattern of higher muscle activity was observed with specific milking units. Milking unit weight, milk tube spread, and teat cup shape may explain differences in muscle activity levels.

conclusionsMilking unit design may influence muscle activity levels among parlor workers. Small reductions in muscle activity associated with milking unit design have the potential to delay the onset of fatigue or development of musculoskeletal health outcomes among parlor workers.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaDairyingDeltoid MuscleElectromyographyEquipment DesignErgonomicsForearmHumansMaleSuperficial Back MusclesTask Performance and AnalysisUnited StatesYoung AdultDairyElectromyographyEquipmentMilking unit

Identifiers

PMID27633245
PMCPMC7008452
OpenAlexW2514409804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.