Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27632342›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2017

Hydrogel injection reduces rectal toxicity after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Michael Pinkawa, Vanessa Berneking, Liane König, Dilini Frank, Marilou Bretgeld, Michael J Eble

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of rectal displacement devices in managing prostate motion: a systematic review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael PinkawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52057, Aachen, Deutschland. MPinkawa@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6450-297X
Vanessa BernekingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52057, Aachen, Deutschland.
Liane KönigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52057, Aachen, Deutschland.
Dilini FrankDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52057, Aachen, Deutschland.
Marilou BretgeldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52057, Aachen, Deutschland.
Michael J EbleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52057, Aachen, Deutschland.
RWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInjection of a hydrogel spacer before prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT) is known to reduce the dose to the rectal wall. Clinical results from the patient's perspective are needed to better assess a possible benefit.

methodsA group of 167 consecutive patients who received prostate RT during the years 2010 to 2013 with 2‑Gy fractions up to 76 Gy (without hydrogel, n = 66) or 76-80 Gy (with hydrogel, n = 101) were included. The numbers of interventions resulting from bowel problems during the first 2 years after RT were compared. Patients were surveyed prospectively before RT, at the last day of RT, and at a median of 2 and 17 months after RT using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite).

resultsBaseline patient characteristics were well balanced. Treatment for bowel symptoms (0 vs. 11 %; p < 0.01) and endoscopic examinations (3 vs. 19 %; p < 0.01) were performed less frequently with a spacer. Mean bowel function scores did not change for patients with a spacer in contrast to patients without a spacer (mean decrease of 5 points) >1 year after RT in comparison to baseline, with 0 vs. 12 % reporting a new moderate/big problem with passing stools (p < 0.01). Statistically significant differences were found for the items "loose stools", "bloody stools", "painful bowel movements" and "frequency of bowel movements".

conclusionSpacer injection is associated with a significant benefit for patients after prostate cancer RT.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overHumansHydrogelsInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiation ProtectionRadiotherapy DosageRectal DiseasesTreatment OutcomeHydrogelsProstate neoplasmQuality of lifeQuestionnairesRadiotherapy, image-guidedRadiotherapy, intensity-modulatedSpacer

Identifiers

PMID27632342
OpenAlexW2519107131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.