Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27632231›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2016

Patients' Adherence to Recommended Follow-up Eye Care After Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in a Publicly Funded County Clinic and Factors Associated With Follow-up Eye Care Use.

Zachary Keenum, Gerald McGwin, C Douglas Witherspoon, Julia A Haller, Mark E Clark, Cynthia Owsley

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01744132 (Overcoming Barriers in Vision Care Utilization of African Americans With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01744132 nacompletednot on this map

Overcoming Barriers in Vision Care Utilization of African Americans With Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorWills EyeRan2012 to 2016Enrolled3,000ConditionsDiabetic Retinopathy, Diabetes MellitusArmsAim 3: Contract
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): optometric exam improves access and utilization of eye care services.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Predictors of Clinic Attendance After Community-Based Vision Screening.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Factors Associated with Follow-Up Adherence After Teleophthalmology for Diabetic Eye Screening Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary KeenumDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Gerald McGwinDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
C Douglas WitherspoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Julia A HallerWills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mark E ClarkDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Cynthia OwsleyDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USWills Eye Hospital · US

Funding

Improving Access to and Quality of Eye Care in an At-Risk, Underserved PopulationU58DP002651 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI OWSLEY, CYNTHIA · 2010 to 2015
$1.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP002651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe public health success of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening programs depends on patients' adherence to the timetable of follow-up eye care recommended by the screening program. African Americans are among those at highest risk for DR and have one of the lowest rates of eye care use.

objectivesTo assess the rate of adhering to recommended follow-up eye care in a DR screening program administered in a safety-net health care facility and to examine factors associated with follow-up eye care use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsProspective follow-up study of persons with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The setting was an internal medicine clinic of a publicly funded health system in Alabama, serving a population largely uninsured and African American, that had implemented a DR screening program using a nonmydriatic camera for ocular imaging and remote reading centers for evaluation of images. Patients with physician appointments between January 26 and July 24, 2012, were eligible for screening if they had a diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes and were 19 years or older. Data from the county health system's administrative database were obtained from January 26, 2012 (date of first enrollee), through May 1, 2015, to establish participants' eye care use in the ophthalmology clinic after screening. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adherence to the recommended interval of follow-up eye appointments in the facility's ophthalmology service as determined by administrative records, as well as factors associated with adherence.

resultsDiabetic retinopathy screening was completed in 949 adults with diabetes, of whom 84.5% (802 of 949) were African American, 64.5% (612 of 949) were women, and 71.7% (680 of 949) lacked health insurance. Participants ranged in age from 21 to 95 years, and their mean (SD) age was 53.9 (10.4) years. The mean (SD) age at diabetes diagnosis was 44.3 (12.5) years, and the mean (SD) duration of diabetes was 9.6 (9.4) years. Across interval recommendation types, 29.9% (284 of 949) adhered to obtaining comprehensive follow-up eye care within the recommended time frame. Two years after a participant's screening date, 50.9% (483 of 949) had no record of having received eye care. Factors associated with adhering to interval appointments were having an advanced age (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and knowing one's glycated hemoglobin level (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.34-2.97). Agreeing to assistance in making a follow-up eye care appointment was associated with nonadherence (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: After a DR screening program in a public clinic largely serving an African American population, only one-third of participants adhered to interval recommendations for follow-up eye appointments, even though cost and accessibility were minimized as barriers to care. Our findings suggest that DR screening programs are not likely to meet their public health goals without incorporation of eye health education initiatives successfully promoting adherence to recommended comprehensive eye care for preventing vision loss.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlabamaAmbulatory Care FacilitiesBlindnessContinuity of Patient CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID27632231
OpenAlexW2520088743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.