Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27632215›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

A multicenter, 12-month randomized study comparing dexamethasone intravitreal implant with ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema.

David G Callanan, Anat Loewenstein, Sunil S Patel, Pascale Massin, Borja Corcóstegui, Xiao-Yan Li, Jenny Jiao, Yehia Hashad, Scott M Whitcup

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01492400 (Safety and Efficacy Study of Dexamethasone Versus Ranibizumab in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01492400 phase2completednot on this map

Safety and Efficacy Study of Dexamethasone Versus Ranibizumab in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2012 to 2014Enrolled363ConditionsMacular EdemaArmsdexamethasone Intravitreal Implant, ranibizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of intravitreal VEGF inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The correlation between intracystic reflectivity and intraocular inflammation in diabetic macular edema: a novel inflammatory biomarker.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Switching to subtenon triamcinolone acetonide does not jeopardize the functional and anatomic outcomes of dexamethasone implant treated eyes with diabetic macular edema.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

David G CallananTexas Retina Associates, 801 W Randol Mill Rd, Suite 101, Arlington, TX, 76012, USA. dcallanan@texasretina.com.
Anat LoewensteinTel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sunil S PatelWest Texas Retina, Abilene, TX, USA.
Pascale MassinParis Diderot University, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Borja CorcósteguiInstitute of Ocular Microsurgery, Barcelona, Spain.
Xiao-Yan LiAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jenny JiaoAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Yehia HashadAllergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Scott M WhitcupJules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Allergan (United States) · USDoheny Eye Institute · USHôpital Lariboisière · FRInstituto de Microcirugía Ocular · ESTexas Retina Associates (United States) · USWest Texas Retina Consultants · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant) 0.7 mg every 5 months provides a similar average change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline as ranibizumab 0.5 mg administered as per its European Summary of Product Characteristics in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

methodsThis was a multicenter, open-label, 12-month, randomized, parallel-group, noninferiority study in patients with DME (one eye/patient). The primary efficacy measure was BCVA using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. Secondary efficacy measures included area of leakage on fluorescein angiography and central retinal thickness (CRT) on optical coherence tomography.

resultsBaseline patient characteristics were similar in the two treatment groups (DEX implant, n = 181; ranibizumab, n = 182); mean DME duration was ∼33 months. The mean average BCVA change from baseline over 12 months was 4.34 letters with DEX implant and 7.60 letters with ranibizumab. The lower limit of the 95 % confidence interval of the between-group difference was -4.74 letters, and therefore, DEX was demonstrated to be noninferior to ranibizumab based on the prespecified noninferiority margin of 5 letters. At monthly follow-up visits, the percentage of patients with ≥15-letter BCVA gain from baseline ranged from 7.2 to 17.7 % with DEX implant and 4.4 to 26.9 % with ranibizumab. Both DEX implant and ranibizumab effectively reduced CRT and reduced the area of fluorescein leakage. Between-group differences in change from baseline CRT favored DEX implant at 1, 2, 6, and 7 months (p ≤ 0.007) and ranibizumab at 4, 5, 9, and 10 months (p < 0.001); the decrease in fluorescein leakage area was greater with DEX implant than ranibizumab at month 12 (p < 0.001). Ocular adverse events in the study eye were more frequent in the DEX implant group because of the occurrence of intraocular pressure (IOP) increases and cataract. IOP increases were transient and generally managed with topical medication.

conclusionsBoth DEX implant and ranibizumab were well tolerated and improved BCVA and anatomic outcomes in patients with DME. DEX implant met the a priori criterion for noninferiority to ranibizumab in average change from baseline BCVA over 12 months. Noninferiority was achieved with an average of 2.85 DEX implant injections and 8.70 ranibizumab injections per patient.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsDexamethasoneDiabetic RetinopathyDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug ImplantsFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiGlucocorticoidsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsAngiogenesis InhibitorsDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsGlucocorticoidsRanibizumabDexamethasoneDiabetic macular edemaIntravitrealNoninferiorityRandomized clinical trialRanibizumab

Identifiers

PMID27632215
OpenAlexW2511794381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.