Observational studyJAMA oncology2017
Changes in Antiemetic Overuse in Response to Choosing Wisely Recommendations.
Observational study in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk prediction models for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- De-implementing low-value care in cancer care delivery: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2022Pooled it
- The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review.The Milbank quarterly · 2021Pooled it
- Therapeutic Use of Medical Cannabis Beyond Pain Management in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Patient factors and costs associated with prophylactic neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist use among women with invasive breast cancer.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Effect of a nurse-led multidisciplinary team model on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in lung cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prior Authorization, Quantity Limits, and Step Therapy for Patient-Administered Antiemetics.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- An Estimate of Preventable Harms Associated With Screening Colonoscopy Overuse in the U.S.AJPM focus · 2025Article
- Costs and Access Barriers to Ondansetron in the US.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Trends in low-value cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic.The American journal of managed care · 2024Article
- 2023 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: controlling nausea and vomiting with chemotherapy of low or minimal emetic potential.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Patterns of Diagnostic Evaluation and Determinants of Treatment in Older Patients With Non-transfusion Dependent Myelodysplastic Syndromes.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Olanzapine as antiemetic drug in oncology: a retrospective study in non-responders to standard antiemetic therapy.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
- Medication overuse in oncology: current trends and future implications for patients and society.The Lancet. Oncology · 2018Review
- Choosing wisely in oncology: necessity and obstacles.ESMO open · 2018Review
- The Impact of Cholecystectomy After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Complicated Gallstone Disease.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Chemotherapy-Associated nausea and vomiting: A cross-sectional survey of occurrence and management patterns at jos university teaching hospital, Nigeria.Annals of African medicineArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceAntiemetics are used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer. Newer antiemetic agents (serotonin and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists) have increased efficacy but are expensive. The American Society of Clinical Oncology's first guideline in the 2013 Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign discouraged overuse of expensive antiemetics in patients with low risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. However, little is known about patterns or trends in antiemetic overuse or whether any change has occurred with the publication of the CW recommendations.
objectiveTo estimate the baseline prevalence, trends, determinants, and costs of antiemetic overuse from January 1, 2008, through March 31, 2015. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsFrom January 1, 2008, through March 31, 2015, this observational study applied descriptive (univariate and bivariate) and multivariable logistic regression analyses to longitudinal health insurance enrollment and nationwide MarketScan insurance claims data for 678 220 privately insured patients receiving chemotherapy before and after the October 29, 2013, announcement of the CW guidelines. The baseline prevalence, trends, determinants, and costs of antiemetic overuse were estimated in cases stratified by risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Antiemetic use, overuse measure, and expenses before and after the publication of the CW recommendation, with adjustment for patient and health care professional characteristics.
resultsThe sample included 678 220 adults who started chemotherapy during the observation period. The average age of the sample was 59.5 years, with 58.2% (n = 394 724) female. Antiemetic overuse occurred in 24.1% (n = 163 451) of patients, with highest rates among those receiving intravenous chemotherapy with high chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting risk (32.4% [n = 106 795]). Compared with baseline before the CW, patients had 7.0% lower odds of antiemetic overuse (95% CI, 4.4%-9.5%) during the 6 months after the CW, but this decrease was transitory: the odds of antiemetic overuse were 7.4% (95% CI, 4.6%-10.2%) higher than baseline at 6 months after the CW. Low-risk intravenous chemotherapy agents had overuse that continued to decrease 6 months after the CW. Antiemetic overuse was associated with higher costs. Reducing antiemetic overuse could have paid for 6.1% (95% CI, 5.8%-6.4%) of the chemotherapy drug costs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Antiemetic overuse is prevalent and results in unnecessary spending associated with systemic chemotherapy treatment. Short-term decreases in antiemetic overuse were associated with the CW recommendation, but sustained decreases occurred in only one risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.