Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27632168›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A Network-Based Data Integration Approach to Support Drug Repurposing and Multi-Target Therapies in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Francesca Vitali, Laurie D Cohen, Andrea Demartini, Angela Amato, Vincenzo Eterno, Alberto Zambelli, Riccardo Bellazzi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca VitaliDipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e dell'Informazione, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-6402
Laurie D CohenDipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e dell'Informazione, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Andrea DemartiniDipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e dell'Informazione, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Angela AmatoIRCCS-Fondazione S. Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Vincenzo EternoIRCCS-Fondazione S. Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Alberto ZambelliIRCCS-Fondazione S. Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Riccardo BellazziDipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e dell'Informazione, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITFondazione Salvatore Maugeri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of data and knowledge from heterogeneous sources can be a key success factor in drug design, drug repurposing and multi-target therapies. In this context, biological networks provide a useful instrument to highlight the relationships and to model the phenomena underlying therapeutic action in cancer. In our work, we applied network-based modeling within a novel bioinformatics pipeline to identify promising multi-target drugs. Given a certain tumor type/subtype, we derive a disease-specific Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network by combining different data-bases and knowledge repositories. Next, the application of suitable graph-based algorithms allows selecting a set of potentially interesting combinations of drug targets. A list of drug candidates is then extracted by applying a recent data fusion approach based on matrix tri-factorization. Available knowledge about selected drugs mechanisms of action is finally exploited to identify the most promising candidates for planning in vitro studies. We applied this approach to the case of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), a subtype of breast cancer whose biology is poorly understood and that lacks of specific molecular targets. Our "in-silico" findings have been confirmed by a number of in vitro experiments, whose results demonstrated the ability of the method to select candidates for drug repurposing.

Indexed as

Systems IntegrationAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansModels, TheoreticalMonte Carlo MethodTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27632168
PMCPMC5025072
OpenAlexW2519842263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.