Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27631994›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2016

Optimising magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluation of the ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis: a multi-centre study.

S Schmidt, C A Henke, D Wittschieber, V Vieth, T Bajanowski, F Ramsthaler, K Püschel, H Pfeiffer, A Schmeling, R Schulz

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Methodology for the identification of vulnerable asylum seekers.International journal of legal medicine · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S SchmidtInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, Münster, 48149, Germany.
C A HenkeInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, Münster, 48149, Germany.
D WittschieberInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, Münster, 48149, Germany.
V ViethInstitut für Klinische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, 48149, Germany.
T BajanowskiInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45122, Germany.
F RamsthalerInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universität des Saarlandes, Gebäude 80. 2, Homburg Saar, 66421, Germany.
K PüschelInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Butenfeld 34, Hamburg, 22529, Germany.
H PfeifferInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, Münster, 48149, Germany.
A SchmelingInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, Münster, 48149, Germany. andreas.schmeling@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-1617
R SchulzInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, Münster, 48149, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEEssen University Hospital · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of the ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis plays a key role in forensic age estimation, particularly in determining whether the age of 18 has been attained. A key research objective in the forensic age estimation field at present is to establish non-X-ray methods for investigating the clavicle. This paper looks at the use of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the developmental state of the medial clavicular epiphysis. Clavicle specimens obtained from autopsies of 125 female and 270 male subjects aged from 10 to 30 were examined using a 3-T magnetic resonance scanner. One FFE-3D-T1 gradient echo sequence and one 2D-T2 turbo spin echo sequence were acquired. In each case, two investigators undertook a consensual determination of the ossification stage of the medial clavicular epiphysis using recognised classification systems. To determine intra-observer and inter-observer agreement, 80 clavicle specimens were subjected to repeat evaluation. We present statistics relating to the ossification stages. The inclusion of established sub-stages of clavicular ossification offers an additional option for determining whether a subject has attained the age of 18 which is applicable in both sexes. For both sexes, the minimum ages for ossification stages 4 and 5 allow conclusions to be drawn about a subject's age at a point in time lying several years in the past. Magnetic resonance imaging is a valid investigatory procedure for determining the ossification stage of the medial clavicular epiphysis. This paper makes a contribution to expanding the range of methods available for forensic age estimation.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisAdolescentAdultAge Determination by SkeletonChildClavicleEpiphysesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultClavicleForensic age estimationMagnetic resonance imagingOssification

Identifiers

PMID27631994
OpenAlexW2512841934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.