Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27631793›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2017

Nuclear morphologies: their diversity and functional relevance.

Benjamin M Skinner, Emma E P Johnson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Models of Cellular Mechanosensation.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rare Cell Population Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  11. How the chromatin landscape influences nuclear morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Focal adhesion kinase regulates tendon cell mechanoresponse and physiological tendon development.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neutrophil nucleus: shaping the past and the future.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2023
    Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin M SkinnerDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QP, UK. bms41@cam.ac.uk.
Emma E P JohnsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1QP, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of chromosome and genome biology often focus on condensed chromatin in the form of chromosomes and neglect the non-dividing cells. Even when interphase nuclei are considered, they are often then treated as interchangeable round objects. However, different cell types can have very different nuclear shapes, and these shapes have impacts on cellular function; indeed, many pathologies are linked with alterations to nuclear shape. In this review, we describe some of the nuclear morphologies beyond the spherical and ovoid. Many of the leukocytes of the immune system have lobed nuclei, which aid their flexibility and migration; smooth muscle cells have a spindle shaped nucleus, which must deform during muscle contractions; spermatozoa have highly condensed nuclei which adopt varied shapes, potentially associated with swimming efficiency. Nuclei are not passive passengers within the cell. There are clear effects of nuclear shape on the transcriptional activity of the cell. Recent work has shown that regulation of gene expression can be influenced by nuclear morphology, and that cells can drastically remodel their chromatin during differentiation. The link between the nucleoskeleton and the cytoskeleton at the nuclear envelope provides a mechanism for transmission of mechanical forces into the nucleus, directly affecting chromatin compaction and organisation.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusAnimalsEukaryotic CellsHumansChromatinDifferentiationEukaryoteGene expressionShape

Identifiers

PMID27631793
PMCPMC5371643
OpenAlexW2512365985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.