ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2018
Monitoring Treatment Progress and Providing Feedback is Viewed Favorably but Rarely Used in Practice.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06515236 (Strategic Treatment Assessment With Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategic Treatment Assessment With Youth (STAY): A Measurement-based Care Approach to Promote Treatment Retention Among Racial and Ethnic Minoritized Youth With Depression or Suicide Risk
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 246 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remote Measurement-Based Care Interventions for Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Psychotherapists' Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring: A Qualitative Meta-analysis.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Behavioral Economics Interventions in Clinical Decision Support Systems.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of a leadership-focused implementation strategy on uptake of digital measurement-based care in mental health clinics: a cluster randomized trial.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Trial
- Effects of an Organizational Implementation Strategy on Sustainment of Measurement-Based Care in Community Mental Health.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Trial
- Randomized Trial of an Organizational Implementation Strategy to Improve Measurement-Based Care Fidelity and Youth Outcomes in Community Mental Health.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Improving measurement-based care implementation in youth mental health through organizational leadership and climate: a mechanistic analysis within a randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2024Trial
- Effects of an Artificial Intelligence Platform for Behavioral Interventions on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Mediators of measurement-based care implementation in community mental health settings: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.Implementation science : IS · 2022Trial
- A Method for Tracking Implementation Strategies: An Exemplar Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Community Behavioral Health Clinics.Behavior therapy · 2018Trial
- Adolescent Client and Clinician Predictors of Measurement-Based Care Fidelity in Community Mental Health Settings.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53Trial
- Experience with standardized assessments in child and adolescent psychiatry: Findings from a national trainee survey in Switzerland.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Parenting Interventions for Child Mental Health: The Science and Practice of Measurement-Based Care.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2026Review
- Patient Identification of the most important outcomes in a gastrointestinal behavioral health program.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Enhancing Clinical Depression Treatment Outcomes: A Comprehensive Approach Using Measurement-Based Care, Research Benchmarks, and Systematic Quality Improvements.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- Examining Real-World Implementation of Measurement-Based Care and its Influence on Emergency Department Visit Risk Among Outpatients With Mood and Anxiety Disorders.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- Understanding sustainability of measurement-based care in child and adolescent mental health services: a study protocol.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Preliminary Psychometric Properties of Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self-Report Version: Validity, Reliability, and the Cut-Off Point in Persian Clinical Samples.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Taking measurement-based care to school: Evaluating teacher-report versions of the behavior and feelings survey and the top problems assessment.Psychological assessment · 2026Article
- Latent Profile Analysis of Distinct Patterns of Treatment and Assessment Practices among Youth Mental Health Providers.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous trials demonstrate that monitoring client progress and using feedback for clinical decision-making enhances treatment outcomes, but available data suggest these practices are rare in clinical settings and no psychometrically validated measures exist for assessing attitudinal barriers to these practices. This national survey of 504 clinicians collected data on attitudes toward and use of monitoring and feedback. Two new measures were developed and subjected to factor analysis: The monitoring and feedback attitudes scale (MFA), measuring general attitudes toward monitoring and feedback, and the attitudes toward standardized assessment scales-monitoring and feedback (ASA-MF), measuring attitudes toward standardized progress tools. Both measures showed good fit to their final factor solutions, with excellent internal consistency for all subscales. Scores on the MFA subscales (Benefit, Harm) indicated that clinicians hold generally positive attitudes toward monitoring and feedback, but scores on the ASA-MF subscales (Clinical Utility, Treatment Planning, Practicality) were relatively neutral. Providers with cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientations held more positive attitudes. Only 13.9 % of clinicians reported using standardized progress measures at least monthly and 61.5 % never used them. Providers with more positive attitudes reported higher use, providing initial support for the predictive validity of the ASA-MF and MFA. Thus, while clinicians report generally positive attitudes toward monitoring and feedback, routine collection of standardized progress measures remains uncommon. Implications for the dissemination and implementation of monitoring and feedback systems are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.