Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27631521›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2016

Validation of a Proposed Tumor Regression Grading Scheme for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy as a Prognostic Indicator for Survival.

Sun Mi Lee, Matthew H G Katz, Li Liu, Manonmani Sundar, Hua Wang, Gauri R Varadhachary, Robert A Wolff, Jeffrey E Lee, Anirban Maitra, Jason B Fleming and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Spatial Configuration of Pancreatic Cancer Is Associated with Disease Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative-Intent Resection.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neoadjuvant therapy leads to objective response in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sun Mi LeeDepartments of *Pathology †Surgical Oncology §Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology ‡Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Matthew H G Katz
Li Liu
Manonmani Sundar
Hua Wang
Gauri R Varadhachary
Robert A Wolff
Jeffrey E Lee
Anirban Maitra
Jason B Fleming
Asif Rashid
Huamin Wang

Funding

Novel Signaling Pathways Regulating Pancreatic Cancer PathogenesisR01CA196941 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WANG, HUAMIN · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy has been increasingly used to treat patients with potentially resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although the College of American Pathologists (CAP) grading scheme for tumor response in posttherapy specimens has been used, its clinical significance has not been validated. Previously, we proposed a 3-tier histologic tumor regression grading (HTRG) scheme (HTRG 0, no viable tumor; HTRG 1, <5% viable tumor cells; HTRG 2, ≥5% viable tumor cells) and showed that the 3-tier HTRG scheme correlated with prognosis. In this study, we sought to validate our proposed HTRG scheme in a new cohort of 167 consecutive PDAC patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. We found that patients with HTRG 0 or 1 were associated with a lower frequency of lymph node metastasis (P=0.004) and recurrence (P=0.01), lower ypT (P<0.001) and AJCC stage (P<0.001), longer disease-free survival (DFS, P=0.004) and overall survival (OS, P=0.02) than those with HTRG 2. However, there was no difference in either DFS or OS between the groups with CAP grade 2 and those with CAP grade 3 (P>0.05). In multivariate analysis, HTRG grade 0 or 1 was an independent prognostic factor for better DFS (P=0.03), but not OS. Therefore we validated the proposed HTRG scheme from our previous study. The proposed HTRG scheme is simple and easy to apply in practice by pathologists and might be used as a successful surrogate for longer DFS in patients with potentially resectable PDAC who completed neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantNeoadjuvant TherapyPancreaticoduodenectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27631521
PMCPMC5178828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.