Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27631379›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2016

Racial Differences Among Factors Associated with Participation in Clinical Research Trials.

Anita Kurt, Lauren Semler, Jeanne L Jacoby, Melanie B Johnson, Beth A Careyva, Brian Stello, Timothy Friel, Mark C Knouse, Hope Kincaid, John C Smulian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recommendations to encourage participation of individuals from diverse backgrounds in psychiatric genetic studies.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer Health Literacy and Willingness to Participate in Cancer Research and Donate Bio-Specimens.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anita KurtLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA. Anita.Kurt@lvhn.org.
Lauren SemlerLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.
Jeanne L JacobyLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.
Melanie B JohnsonLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.
Beth A CareyvaLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.
Brian StelloLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.
Timothy FrielLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.
Mark C KnouseLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.
Hope KincaidLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.
John C SmulianLehigh Valley Health Network, Cedar Crest Boulevard and I-78, Allentown, PA, 18103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify whether racial differences exist among various factors associated with patients' decision to participate in clinical research trials.

methodsA self-administered, IRB-approved survey was utilized with inclusion criteria requiring subjects to be 18 years of age or older, having active patient status and ability to complete the survey without assistance. Subjects were asked to rate potential influential motivators, barriers, and facilitators on a "no influence" (0) to "most influence" (4) scale for participation in research that tests a new drug or device. Kruskal-Wallis testing was used to identify factors significantly associated with race.

resultsAnalysis included 1643 surveys: 949 (57.8 %) Caucasian; 217 (13.2 %) African-American; 317 (19.3 %) Hispanic; 62 (3.8 %) Multiracial; and 98 (6.0 %) "Other" minorities. Statistically significant differences (p ≤ .02) by race were found for five out of ten motivating factors. "How well the research study is explained to me" had the highest mean value for all races except other minorities, for whom "Knowledge learned from my participation will benefit someone in the future" scored highest. "Risk of unknown side-effects" was the greatest barrier for all races.

conclusionRacial differences exist not only between Caucasians and Minorities for the factors associated with their clinical trial participation, but also among different minority races themselves. To promote diversity in research, recruitment strategies for each individual race should be customized based on what matters to the target population.

Indexed as

Clinical trial participationDisparities in researchDiversity in researchInfluencing factors in subject participationMinority research participationRacial differences

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.