Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27631375›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

The Genetic Basis of Host Preference and Resting Behavior in the Major African Malaria Vector, Anopheles arabiensis.

Bradley J Main, Yoosook Lee, Heather M Ferguson, Katharina S Kreppel, Anicet Kihonda, Nicodem J Govella, Travis C Collier, Anthony J Cornel, Eleazar Eskin, Eun Yong Kang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Host Feeding Patterns ofBiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The first genome sequence ofF1000Research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bradley J MainVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology/University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Yoosook LeeVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology/University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Heather M FergusonInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Katharina S KreppelInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Anicet KihondaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Nicodem J GovellaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Group, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, United Republic of Tanzania.
Travis C CollierVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology/University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Anthony J CornelDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Eleazar EskinDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Eun Yong KangDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Catelyn C NiemanVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology/University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Allison M WeakleyVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology/University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Gregory C LanzaroVector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology/University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.

Funding

Ecological and genetic determinants of malaria transmitting behaviors in the AfriR01AI085175 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LANZARO, GREGORY C. · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE BIOLOGY OF DISEASE VECTORST32AI074550 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LANZARO, GREGORY C. · 2009 to 2013
$941k
Genome Sequencer FLXS10RR029668 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI NGAI, JOHN J. · 2010 to 2010
$623k
Illumina Sequencer to Facilitate Functional Genomics at BerkeleyS10RR027303 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TAYLOR, JOHN W. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027303NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029668NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI085175NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria transmission is dependent on the propensity of Anopheles mosquitoes to bite humans (anthropophily) instead of other dead end hosts. Recent increases in the usage of Long Lasting Insecticide Treated Nets (LLINs) in Africa have been associated with reductions in highly anthropophilic and endophilic vectors such as Anopheles gambiae s.s., leaving species with a broader host range, such as Anopheles arabiensis, as the most prominent remaining source of transmission in many settings. An. arabiensis appears to be more of a generalist in terms of its host choice and resting behavior, which may be due to phenotypic plasticity and/or segregating allelic variation. To investigate the genetic basis of host choice and resting behavior in An. arabiensis we sequenced the genomes of 23 human-fed and 25 cattle-fed mosquitoes collected both in-doors and out-doors in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. We identified a total of 4,820,851 SNPs, which were used to conduct the first genome-wide estimates of "SNP heritability" for host choice and resting behavior in this species. A genetic component was detected for host choice (human vs cow fed; permuted P = 0.002), but there was no evidence of a genetic component for resting behavior (indoors versus outside; permuted P = 0.465). A principal component analysis (PCA) segregated individuals based on genomic variation into three groups which were characterized by differences at the 2Rb and/or 3Ra paracentromeric chromosome inversions. There was a non-random distribution of cattle-fed mosquitoes between the PCA clusters, suggesting that alleles linked to the 2Rb and/or 3Ra inversions may influence host choice. Using a novel inversion genotyping assay, we detected a significant enrichment of the standard arrangement (non-inverted) of 3Ra among cattle-fed mosquitoes (N = 129) versus all non-cattle-fed individuals (N = 234; χ2, p = 0.007). Thus, tracking the frequency of the 3Ra in An. arabiensis populations may be of use to infer selection on host choice behavior within these vector populations; possibly in response to vector control. Controlled host-choice assays are needed to discern whether the observed genetic component has a direct relationship with innate host preference. A better understanding of the genetic basis for host feeding behavior in An. arabiensis may also open avenues for novel vector control strategies based on driving genes for zoophily into wild mosquito populations.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAnophelesBehavior, AnimalCattleGenotypeHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansInsecticidesInsect VectorsMalariaMosquito ControlPolymorphism, Single NucleotideInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID27631375
PMCPMC5025075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.