Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27631337›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2017

Validation of specificity of antibodies for immunohistochemistry: the case of ROR2.

Sean S Q Ma, Claire E Henry, Estelle Llamosas, Rupert Higgins, Benjamin Daniels, Luke B Hesson, Nicholas J Hawkins, Robyn L Ward, Caroline E Ford

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. January in focus in HCB: antibody validation.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2019
    Article
  10. Ten Basic Rules of Antibody Validation.Analytical chemistry insights · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sean S Q MaAdult Cancer Program, Level 2, Metastasis Research Group, Lowy Cancer Research Centre and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Claire E HenryAdult Cancer Program, Level 2, Metastasis Research Group, Lowy Cancer Research Centre and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Estelle LlamosasAdult Cancer Program, Level 2, Metastasis Research Group, Lowy Cancer Research Centre and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Rupert HigginsAdult Cancer Program, Level 2, Metastasis Research Group, Lowy Cancer Research Centre and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Benjamin DanielsFaculty of Medicine, Medicines Policy Research Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Luke B HessonColorectal Cancer Group, Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Nicholas J HawkinsUniversity of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Robyn L WardUniversity of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.
Caroline E FordAdult Cancer Program, Level 2, Metastasis Research Group, Lowy Cancer Research Centre and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. caroline.ford@unsw.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wnt signalling receptor receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 (ROR2) is implicated in numerous human cancers. However, there have been conflicting reports regarding ROR2 expression, some studies showing upregulation and others downregulation of ROR2 in the same cancer type. The majority of these studies used immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect ROR2 protein, without validation of the used antibodies. There appears to be currently no consensus on the antibody best suited for ROR2 detection or how ROR2 expression changes in various cancer types. We examined three commercially available ROR2 antibodies and found that only one bound specifically to ROR2. Another antibody cross-reacted with other proteins, and the third failed to detect ROR2 at all. ROR2 detection by IHC on 107 patient samples using the ROR2 specific antibody showed that the majority of colorectal cancers show loss of ROR2 protein. We found no association between ROR2 staining and poor patient survival, as had been previously reported. These results question the previously reported association between ROR2 and poor patient survival in colorectal cancer. Future studies should use fully validated antibodies when detecting ROR2 protein, as non-specific staining can lead to irrelevant observations and misinterpretations.

Indexed as

Antibodiesbeta CateninColorectal NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryReceptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan ReceptorsSignal TransductionWnt ProteinsAntibodiesbeta CateninCTNNB1 protein, humanReceptor Tyrosine Kinase-like Orphan ReceptorsROR2 protein, humanWnt ProteinsAntibodiesColorectal cancerImmunohistochemistryROR2

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.