Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27631257›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

Learning curve for gastric cancer patients with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: 6-year experience from a single institution in western China.

Lin-Yong Zhao, Wei-Han Zhang, Yan Sun, Xin-Zu Chen, Kun Yang, Kai Liu, Xiao-Long Chen, Yi-Gao Wang, Xiao-Hai Song, Lian Xue and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Establishing the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic and Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. INFLUENCE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE LAPAROSCOPIC EXPERIENCE SKILLS ON ROBOTIC SURGERY DEXTERITY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First experience of junior surgeons with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: in view of comparison with experienced surgeons.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
  10. Clockwise, Modularized Lymphadenectomy in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery: a New Laparoscopic Surgery Model.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin-Yong ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wei-Han Zhang
Yan Sun
Xin-Zu Chen
Kun Yang
Kai Liu
Xiao-Long Chen
Yi-Gao Wang
Xiao-Hai Song
Lian Xue
Zong-Guang Zhou
Jian-Kun Hu
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is widely used for gastric cancer (GC) patients nowadays. This study aimed to investigate the time trend of outcomes so as to describe the learning curve for GC patients with LADG at a single medical institution in western China over a 6-year period.A total of 246 consecutive GC patients with LADG were divided into 5 groups (group A: 46 patients from 2006 to 2007; group B: 47 patients in 2008; group C: 49 patients in 2009; group D: 73 patients in 2010; and group E: 31 patients in 2011). All surgeries were conducted by the same surgeon. Comparative analyses were successively performed by Mann-Whitney U test or Student t test among the 5 different groups for the clinical data, including clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical parameters, postoperative course, and survival outcomes, through which the learning curve was described.There were no differences in the baseline information among the 5 groups (P > 0.05), and the proportion of advanced GC patients with LADG slightly increased from 58.7% to 77.4% during the 6 years. Besides, the proportion of D2/D2+ lymphadenectomy and the number of retrieved lymph nodes gradually grew from 60.9% to 80.6% and from 20.0 to 28.8, respectively. In addition, the operation time decreased from 299.2 to 267.8 minutes, while the estimated blood loss dropped from 175.2 to 146.8 mL. Furthermore, some surgical parameters (surgical duration and blood loss) and postoperative course (such as postoperative complications, the time to ambulation, to first flatus, and to first liquid intake as well as the length of hospital stay) were all observed to be significantly different between group A and other groups (P < 0.05), illustrating a similar downward trend and remaining stable to form a plateau after 46 cases in group A. However, no difference on overall survival was found among these 5 groups, and multivariate analysis indicated that factors, such as age, tumor differentiation, tumor size, and T stage as well as N stage, were independent prognostic factors for patients with LADG.Improvement on surgical parameters and postoperative course can be seen over the past years, and the cutoff value of the learning curve of LADG for surgeons with rich experience in open operation might be 46 cases.

Indexed as

Learning CurveAdenocarcinomaChinaFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStomachStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27631257
PMCPMC5402600
OpenAlexW2520342760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.