ReviewNeural regeneration research2016
Points regarding cell transplantation for the treatment of spinal cord injury.
Review in Neural regeneration research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of inflammation and Treg cell regulation on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Function of GSK‑3 signaling in spinal cord injury (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Review
- Role of regulatory T cells in spinal cord injury.European journal of medical research · 2023Review
- Hypoxic preconditioned bone mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate spinal cord injury in rats via improved survival and migration.International journal of molecular medicine · 2018Article
- Effects of passage and cryopreservation on neurotrophic factor secretion from choroid plexus epithelial cells.Biomedical reports · 2018Article
- Microenvironment Imbalance of Spinal Cord Injury.Cell transplantation · 2018Review
- Stem cell transplantation for spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness and safety.Neural regeneration research · 2017Article
- Stem Cell Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transplantation of somatic cells, including bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNCs), and choroid plexus epithelial cells (CPECs), enhances the outgrowth of regenerating axons and promotes locomotor improvements. They are not integrated into the host spinal cord, but disappear within 2-3 weeks after transplantation. Regenerating axons extend at the spinal cord lesion through the astrocyte-devoid area that is filled with connective tissue matrices. Regenerating axons have characteristics of peripheral nerves: they are associated with Schwann cells, and embedded in connective tissue matrices. It has been suggested that neurotrophic factors secreted from BMSCs and CPECs promote "intrinsic" ability of the spinal cord to regenerate. Transplanted Schwann cells survive long-term, and are integrated into the host spinal cord, serving as an effective scaffold for the outgrowth of regenerating axons in the spinal cord. The disadvantage that axons are blocked to extend through the glial scar at the border of the lesion is overcome. Schwann cells have been approved for clinical applications. Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) survive long-term, proliferate, and differentiate into glial cells and/or neurons after transplantation. No method is available at present to manipulate and control the behaviors of NPSCs to allow them to appropriately integrate into the host spinal cord. NPSP transplantation is not necessarily effective for locomotor improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.