Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27630670›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2016

Lim kinase, a bi-functional effector in injury-induced structural plasticity of synapses.

Weiwei Wang, Ellen Townes-Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Weiwei WangDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, New Jersey Medical School, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ellen Townes-AndersonDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, New Jersey Medical School, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Neural Stability after Retinal DetachmentR01EY021542 · NEI · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI TOWNES-ANDERSON, ELLEN S, WHITEHEAD, IAN P · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural plasticity of synaptic terminals contributes to normal nervous system function but also to neural degeneration, in the form of terminal retraction, and regeneration, due to process growth. Synaptic morphological change is mediated through the actin cytoskeleton, which is enriched in axonal and dendritic terminals. Whereas the three RhoGTPases, RhoA, Cdc42 and Rac, function as upstream signaling nodes sensitive to extracellular stimuli, LIMK-cofilin activity serves as a common downstream effector to up-regulate actin turnover, which is necessary for both polymerization and depolymerization. The dual effects of LIMK activity make LIMK a potential target of therapeutic intervention for injury-induced synaptic plasticity, as LIMK inhibition can stabilize actin cytoskeleton and preserve existing structure. This therapeutic benefit of LIMK inhibition has been demonstrated in animal models of injury-induced axon retraction and neuritic sprouting by rod photoreceptors. A better understanding of the regulation of LIMK-cofilin activity and the interaction with the microtubular cytoskeleton may open new ways to promote synaptic regeneration that can benefit neuronal degenerative disease.

Indexed as

actin turnovercofilinLIMKRhoGTPasesstructural plasticitysynaptic degeneration and regeneration

Identifiers

PMID27630670
PMCPMC4994429
OpenAlexW2495591779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.