Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27630586›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016

Promoting Mentalizing in Pupils by Acting on Teachers: Preliminary Italian Evidence of the "Thought in Mind" Project.

Annalisa Valle, Davide Massaro, Ilaria Castelli, Francesca Sangiuliano Intra, Elisabetta Lombardi, Edoardo Bracaglia, Antonella Marchetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Disturbed families or families disturbed: a reconsideration.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annalisa ValleResearch Unit on Theory of Mind, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy.
Davide MassaroResearch Unit on Theory of Mind, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy.
Ilaria CastelliResearch Unit on Theory of Mind, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy; Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Università degli Studi di BergamoBergamo, Italy.
Francesca Sangiuliano IntraResearch Unit on Theory of Mind, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy.
Elisabetta LombardiResearch Unit on Theory of Mind, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy.
Edoardo BracagliaDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milan, Italy.
Antonella MarchettiResearch Unit on Theory of Mind, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy; Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentalization research focuses on different aspects of this topic, highlighting individual differences in mentalizing and proposing programs of intervention for children and adults to increase this ability. The "Thought in Mind Project" (TiM Project) provides training targeted to adults-teachers or parents-to increase their mentalization and, consequently, to obtain mentalization improvement in children. The present research aimed to explore for the first time ever the potential of training for teachers based on the TiM Project, regarding the enhancement of mentalizing of an adult who would have interacted as a teacher with children. For this reason, two teachers - similar for meta-cognitive and meta-emotional skills - and their classes (N = 46) were randomly assigned to the training or control condition. In the first case, the teacher participated in training on the implementation of promotion of mentalizing in everyday school teaching strategies; in the second case the teacher participated in a control activity, similar to training for scheduling and methods, but without promoting the implementation of mentalization (in both conditions two meetings lasting about 3 h at the beginning of the school year and two supervisions during the school year were conducted). The children were tested by tasks assessing several aspects of mentalization (second and third-order false belief understanding, Strange Stories, Reading the mind in the Eyes, Mentalizing Task) both before and after the teacher participate in the TiM or control training (i.e., at the beginning and at the end of the school year). The results showed that, although some measured components of mentalization progressed over time, only the TiM Project training group significantly improved in third order false belief understanding and changed - in a greater way compared to the control group - in two of the three components of the Mentalizing Task. These evidences are promising about the idea that the creation of a mentalizing community promotes the mentalization abilities of its members.

Indexed as

mentalizingresilienceteacher-pupil relationshiptheory of mindTiM Projecttraining

Identifiers

PMID27630586
PMCPMC5005929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.