Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27630546›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2016

Persistent Thalamic Sound Processing Despite Profound Cochlear Denervation.

Anna R Chambers, Juan J Salazar, Daniel B Polley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Synaptopathy in the Aging Cochlea: Characterizing Early-Neural Deficits in Auditory Temporal Envelope Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna R ChambersEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Boston, MA, USA.
Juan J SalazarEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryBoston, MA, USA; Department of Biology, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research UniversityParis, France.
Daniel B PolleyEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryBoston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MA, USA.
École Normale Supérieure - PSL · FRHarvard University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Activity-Dependent Influences on Auditory CircuitsR01DC009836 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI POLLEY, DANIEL B. · 2009 to 2024
$6.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons at higher stages of sensory processing can partially compensate for a sudden drop in peripheral input through a homeostatic plasticity process that increases the gain on weak afferent inputs. Even after a profound unilateral auditory neuropathy where >95% of afferent synapses between auditory nerve fibers and inner hair cells have been eliminated with ouabain, central gain can restore cortical processing and perceptual detection of basic sounds delivered to the denervated ear. In this model of profound auditory neuropathy, auditory cortex (ACtx) processing and perception recover despite the absence of an auditory brainstem response (ABR) or brainstem acoustic reflexes, and only a partial recovery of sound processing at the level of the inferior colliculus (IC), an auditory midbrain nucleus. In this study, we induced a profound cochlear neuropathy with ouabain and asked whether central gain enabled a compensatory plasticity in the auditory thalamus comparable to the full recovery of function previously observed in the ACtx, the partial recovery observed in the IC, or something different entirely. Unilateral ouabain treatment in adult mice effectively eliminated the ABR, yet robust sound-evoked activity persisted in a minority of units recorded from the contralateral medial geniculate body (MGB) of awake mice. Sound driven MGB units could decode moderate and high-intensity sounds with accuracies comparable to sham-treated control mice, but low-intensity classification was near chance. Pure tone receptive fields and synchronization to broadband pulse trains also persisted, albeit with significantly reduced quality and precision, respectively. MGB decoding of temporally modulated pulse trains and speech tokens were both greatly impaired in ouabain-treated mice. Taken together, the absence of an ABR belied a persistent auditory processing at the level of the MGB that was likely enabled through increased central gain. Compensatory plasticity at the level of the auditory thalamus was less robust overall than previous observations in cortex or midbrain. Hierarchical differences in compensatory plasticity following sensorineural hearing loss may reflect differences in GABA circuit organization within the MGB, as compared to the ACtx or IC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionCochlear DiseasesDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme InhibitorsEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemGeniculate BodiesHearing Loss, CentralInferior ColliculiMiceNeuronal PlasticityOuabainEnzyme InhibitorsOuabaincochlear neuropathycompensatory plasticityhearing losshomeostatic plasticitymedial geniculate body

Identifiers

PMID27630546
PMCPMC5005347
OpenAlexW2516234370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.