ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2016
Clinical measures as valid predictors and discriminators of the level of community ambulation of hemiparetic stroke survivors.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Independent Community Ambulation in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study of Gait Speed, Gait Endurance, and Balance Self-Efficacy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Determination of Five Sit-to-Stand Test Performance at Discharge of Stroke Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Teleassessments of Lower Limb Function in Adult Stroke Survivors: A Preliminary Study Evaluating Safety, Feasibility, and Validity for Telerehabilitation.Telemedicine reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of balance performance for improvements of community ambulation among stroke patients: a cohort study.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Commentary: Remote assessments of gait and balance - Implications for research during and beyond Covid-19.Topics in stroke rehabilitation · 2022Article
- The six-minute walk test as a fall risk screening tool in community programs for persons with stroke: a cross-sectional analysis.Topics in stroke rehabilitation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To investigate clinical measures as valid predictors and discriminators of the level of community ambulation of hemiparetic stroke survivors. [Subjects and Methods] Seventy-five hemiparetic stroke patients were separated into a community ambulation group (>0.8 m/s) and a limited community ambulation group (0.4-0.8 m/s). The dorsiflexor strength of the affected side, Sit to Stand (STS) test, Timed Up & Go (TUG) test, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), 2-min step test (2mST), and 6-min walk test (6mWT) were used for evaluation. The discriminative powers of the tests and measures were investigated using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and odd ratios were calculated to predict the level of community ambulation. [Results] The cutoff values for predicting the level of community ambulation (>0.8 m/s) were <14.77 s for TUG, <12.6 s for STS, a score >46.5 for BBS, a score >25.5 for FMA, a score <13.5 for FES, >7.5 kg for dorsiflexor strength, >30 times for 2mST, and >318 m for 6mWT. All clinical measures except FES had moderate accuracy according to the area under the curve of 0.76-0.88 (70-93%). [Conclusion] Clinical measures (except FES) have moderate validity in predicting the level of community ambulation of stroke survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.