Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27630096›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2016

Feasibility of supervised self-testing using an oral fluid-based HIV rapid testing method: a cross-sectional, mixed method study among pregnant women in rural India.

Archana Sarkar, Gitau Mburu, Poonam Varma Shivkumar, Pankhuri Sharma, Fiona Campbell, Jagannath Behera, Ritu Dargan, Surendra Kumar Mishra, Sunil Mehra

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Preferences for oral-World journal of methodology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Archana SarkarResearch, Innovations, and Monitoring Unit, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, New Delhi, India; archanas@mamtahimc.orgarchana.sarkar5@gmail.com.
Gitau MburuProgram Impact Unit, International HIV/AIDS Alliance, East Sussex, UK.
Poonam Varma ShivkumarDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, India.
Pankhuri SharmaResearch, Innovations, and Monitoring Unit, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, New Delhi, India.
Fiona CampbellFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jagannath BeheraResearch, Innovations, and Monitoring Unit, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, New Delhi, India.
Ritu DarganResearch, Innovations, and Monitoring Unit, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, New Delhi, India.
Surendra Kumar MishraResearch, Innovations, and Monitoring Unit, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, New Delhi, India.
Sunil MehraResearch, Innovations, and Monitoring Unit, MAMTA Health Institute for Mother & Child, New Delhi, India.
Mamta Health Institute for Mother and Child · INFaculty of Public Health · GBLancaster University · GBMahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV self-testing can increase coverage of essential HIV services. This study aimed to establish the acceptability, concordance and feasibility of supervised HIV self-testing among pregnant women in rural India.

methodsA cross-sectional, mixed methods study was conducted among 202 consenting pregnant women in a rural Indian hospital between August 2014 and January 2015. Participants were provided with instructions on how to self-test using OraQuick(®) HIV antibody test, and subsequently asked to self-test under supervision of a community health worker. Test results were confirmed at a government-run integrated counselling and testing centre. A questionnaire was used to obtain information on patient demographics and the ease, acceptability and difficulties of self-testing. In-depth interviews were conducted with a sub-sample of 35 participants to understand their experiences.

resultsIn total, 202 participants performed the non-invasive, oral fluid-based, rapid test under supervision for HIV screening. Acceptance rate was 100%. Motivators for self-testing included: ease of testing (43.4%), quick results (27.3%) and non-invasive procedure (23.2%). Sensitivity and specificity were 100% for 201 tests, and one test was invalid. Concordance of test result interpretation between community health workers and participants was 98.5% with a Cohen's Kappa (k) value of k=0.566 with p<0.001 for inter-rater agreement. Although 92.6% participants reported that the instructions for the test were easy to understand, 18.7% required the assistance of a supervisor to self-test. Major themes that emerged from the qualitative interviews indicated the importance of the following factors in influencing acceptability of self-testing: clarity and accessibility of test instructions; time-efficiency and convenience of testing; non-invasiveness of the test; and fear of incorrect results. Overall, 96.5% of the participants recommended that the OraQuick(®) test kits should become publicly available.

conclusionsSelf-testing for HIV status using an oral fluid-based rapid test under the supervision of a community health worker was acceptable and feasible among pregnant women in rural India. Participants were supportive of making self-testing publicly available. Policy guidelines and implementation research are required to advance HIV self-testing for larger populations at scale.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMass ScreeningMouthPregnancyPregnant PeopleRural PopulationSelf CareSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ViralacceptabilityfeasibilityIndiapregnant womensupervised HIV self-testing

Identifiers

PMID27630096
PMCPMC5023853
OpenAlexW2518905331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.