Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27630071›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Investigating the feasibility of an enhanced contact intervention in self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial delivering a Social support and Wellbeing Intervention following Self Harm (SWISH).

Nilufar Ahmed, Ann John, Saiful Islam, Richard Jones, Pippa Anderson, Charlotte Davies, Ashra Khanom, Shaun Harris, Peter Huxley

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nilufar AhmedSwansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-801X
Ann JohnSwansea University, Swansea, UK.
Saiful IslamSwansea University, Swansea, UK.
Richard JonesHywel Dda University Health Board, Haverfordwest, UK.
Pippa AndersonSwansea University, Swansea, UK.
Charlotte DaviesHywel Dda University Health Board, Haverfordwest, UK.
Ashra KhanomSwansea University, Swansea, UK.
Shaun HarrisSwansea University, Swansea, UK.
Peter HuxleyBangor University, Bangor, UK.
Swansea University · GBHywel Dda University Health Board · GBBangor University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelf-harm is a strong predictor for suicide. Risks for repeat behaviour are heightened in the aftermath of an index episode. There is no consensus on the most effective type of intervention to reduce repetition. Treatment options for patients who do not require secondary mental health services include no support, discharge to general practitioner or referral to primary care mental health support services. The aim of this study is to assess whether it is feasible to deliver a brief intervention after an episode and whether this can reduce depressive symptoms and increase the sense of well-being for patients who self-harm.

methodsThis is a non-blinded parallel group randomised clinical trial. 120 patients presenting with self-harm and/or suicidal ideation to mental health services over a 12-month period who are not referred to secondary services will be randomised to either intervention plus treatment as usual (TAU), or control (TAU only). Patients are assessed at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks with standardised measures to collect data on depression, well-being and service use. Primary outcome is depression scores and secondary outcomes are well-being scores and use of services. The findings will indicate whether a rapid response brief intervention is feasible and can reduce depression and increase well-being among patients who self-harm and do not require secondary services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the UK National Health Service (NHS) Ethics Committee process (REC 6: 14/WA/0074). The findings of the trial will be disseminated through presentations to the participating Health Board and partners, peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN76914248; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdolescentAdultAgedCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedResearch DesignSecondary PreventionSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicide Preventiondepressioninterventionrandomised controlled trialself harmsocial supportsuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID27630071
PMCPMC5030583
OpenAlexW2520733412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.