Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27630070›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Proportion of neonatal readmission attributed to length of stay for childbirth: a population-based cohort study.

Amy Metcalfe, Matthews Mathai, Shiliang Liu, Juan Andres Leon, K S Joseph

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Newborn Length of Stay and Risk of Readmission.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy MetcalfeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Matthews MathaiDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Shiliang LiuMaternal, Child and Youth Health, Surveillance and Epidemiology Division, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Juan Andres LeonMaternal, Child and Youth Health, Surveillance and Epidemiology Division, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
K S JosephDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

CIHR APR-126338CIHR MAH–115445World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMost literature on length of stay (LOS) for childbirth focuses on 'early' discharge as opposed to 'optimal' time of discharge and has conflicting results due to heterogeneous definitions of 'early' discharge and differing eligibility criteria for these programmes. We aimed to determine the LOS associated with the lowest neonatal readmission rate following childbirth by examining the incidence pattern of neonatal readmission for different LOS using the Kitagawa decomposition.

designRetrospective cohort study using administrative hospitalisation data.

settingCanada (excluding Quebec) from 2003 to 2010. PATIENTS: Term, singleton live births without congenital anomalies.

interventionsLOS for childbirth.

main outcome measureNeonatal readmissions within 30 days of birth.

results1 875 322 live births were included. Neonatal LOS peaked at day 1 (47.3%) after vaginal birth and day 3 (49.3%) following caesarean section; 4.2% of infants were readmitted following vaginal birth and 2.2% after caesarean section. In 2008-2010, most readmissions occurred among infants discharged in the first 2 days (83.8%) following a vaginal birth and among infants discharged in the first 3 days (81.7%) following a caesarean birth. Readmissions increased from 4.1% in 2003-2005 to 4.6% in 2008-2010 among vaginal births and from 2.0% to 2.4% among caesarean births and occurred mostly due to changes in the day-specific readmission rates and not due to reductions in LOS.

conclusionsPatterns of readmission suggest that readmission rates are lowest following a 1-2-day stay following a vaginal birth and a 2-4-day stay following a caesarean birth given the outpatient support in the community.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLength of StayMaleParturitionPatient ReadmissionPregnancyQuebecRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsEPIDEMIOLOGYNEONATOLOGYPAEDIATRICS

Identifiers

PMID27630070
PMCPMC5030571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.