ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2016
An information model for computable cancer phenotypes.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of a computable phenotype to identify pediatric patients with leukemia and lymphoma treated with chemotherapy using electronic health record data.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2019Trial
- Prenatal monitoring in primary health care: a design science research-based approach to FHIR interoperability.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- Identifying Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis and Describing Outcomes Using Computable Phenotypes: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- FHIR Standard-Based Oncology Data Model for Cancer Screening: Design and Implementation Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Establishing core data elements for colorectal cancer and mapping to FHIR resources: Towards interoperable Iranian health information systems.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- HL7 FHIR-based tools and initiatives to support clinical research: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- A cancer graph: a lung cancer property graph database in Neo4j.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Formal representation of patients' care context data: the path to improving the electronic health record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Interactive Exploration of Longitudinal Cancer Patient Histories Extracted From Clinical Text.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Article
- Article
- In silico cancer research towards 3R.BMC cancer · 2018Review
- DMTO: a realistic ontology for standard diabetes mellitus treatment.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2018Article
- Data linkage in medical science using the resource description framework: the AVERT model.HRB open research · 2018Article
- Integrating Structured and Unstructured EHR Data Using an FHIR-based Type System: A Case Study with Medication Data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018Article
- DeepPhe: A Natural Language Processing System for Extracting Cancer Phenotypes from Clinical Records.Cancer research · 2017Article
- Knowledge Representation and Management, It's Time to Integrate!Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
- Representing Knowledge Consistently Across Health Systems.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
- Capturing the Patient's Perspective: a Review of Advances in Natural Language Processing of Health-Related Text.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
- Knowledge-based biomedical Data Science.EPJ data science · 2017Article
- CQL4NLP: Development and Integration of FHIR NLP Extensions in Clinical Quality Language for EHR-driven Phenotyping.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational ScienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStandards, methods, and tools supporting the integration of clinical data and genomic information are an area of significant need and rapid growth in biomedical informatics. Integration of cancer clinical data and cancer genomic information poses unique challenges, because of the high volume and complexity of clinical data, as well as the heterogeneity and instability of cancer genome data when compared with germline data. Current information models of clinical and genomic data are not sufficiently expressive to represent individual observations and to aggregate those observations into longitudinal summaries over the course of cancer care. These models are acutely needed to support the development of systems and tools for generating the so called clinical "deep phenotype" of individual cancer patients, a process which remains almost entirely manual in cancer research and precision medicine.
methodsReviews of existing ontologies and interviews with cancer researchers were used to inform iterative development of a cancer phenotype information model. We translated a subset of the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) models into the OWL 2 Description Logic (DL) representation, and added extensions as needed for modeling cancer phenotypes with terms derived from the NCI Thesaurus. Models were validated with domain experts and evaluated against competency questions.
resultsThe DeepPhe Information model represents cancer phenotype data at increasing levels of abstraction from mention level in clinical documents to summaries of key events and findings. We describe the model using breast cancer as an example, depicting methods to represent phenotypic features of cancers, tumors, treatment regimens, and specific biologic behaviors that span the entire course of a patient's disease.
conclusionsWe present a multi-scale information model for representing individual document mentions, document level classifications, episodes along a disease course, and phenotype summarization, linking individual observations to high-level summaries in support of subsequent integration and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.