Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27629827›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2017

A novel turbidimetric immunoassay for fecal calprotectin optimized for routine chemistry analyzers.

Tom Nilsen, Kathrin Sunde, Lars-Olof Hansson, Aleksandra Mandic Havelka, Anders Larsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tom NilsenDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kathrin SundeGentian AS, Moss, Norway.
Lars-Olof HanssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Aleksandra Mandic HavelkaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute and Clinical Chemistry, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders LarssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFecal calprotectin assays are widely used to exclude inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in patients with suspected IBD. A problem with the fecal calprotectin assays is the rather long test-turnaround times. A particle enhanced turbidimetric immunoassays (PETIA) for fecal calprotectin would reduce test-turnaround times and would permit more laboratories to perform the measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new feces calprotectin PETIA.

methodUsing routine fecal samples the feces calprotectin PETIA was validated on two chemistry analyzers, Mindray BS-380 and Cobas 501.

resultsThe assay is linear in the range 11-2000 μg/g, with a limit of quantitation of approximately 10 μg/g. No antigen excess hook effect was observed up to 10 000-15 000 μg/g depending on the instrument used. The turbidimetric method showed a good agreement with the Bühlmann ELISA. The total coefficient of variation was 3%-8% in the 50-100 μg/g range.

conclusionThe fecal calprotectin PETIA, fCal Turbo, is well suited for rapid analysis of fecal calprotectin on Mindray BS-380 or Cobas 501 clinical chemistry analyzers. The test results are commutable with Bühlmann fecal MRP8/14 ELISA.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFecesHumansImmunoturbidimetryInflammatory Bowel DiseasesLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexLimit of DetectionLinear ModelsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexbiological markerscalprotectinfeceshumansinflammatory bowel diseasesmethod validation

Identifiers

PMID27629827
PMCPMC6817140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.