Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27629806›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied genetics2017

Genomic findings in patients with clinical suspicion of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Magdalena Koczkowska, Jolanta Wierzba, Robert Śmigiel, Maria Sąsiadek, Magdalena Cabała, Ryszard Ślężak, Mariola Iliszko, Iwona Kardaś, Janusz Limon, Beata S Lipska-Ziętkiewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Novel retinal observations in a child with DiGeorge (22q11.2 deletion) syndrome.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic approaches to metabolic bone diseases.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Magdalena KoczkowskaDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki Street, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland.
Jolanta WierzbaGeneral Nursery, Medical University of Gdansk, 7 Debinki Street, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland.
Robert ŚmigielDepartment of Social Pediatrics, Wroclaw Medical University, 5 Bartla Street, 51-618, Wroclaw, Poland.
Maria SąsiadekDepartment of Genetics, Wroclaw Medical University, 1 Marcinkowskiego Street, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland.
Magdalena CabałaDepartment of Social Pediatrics, Wroclaw Medical University, 5 Bartla Street, 51-618, Wroclaw, Poland.
Ryszard ŚlężakDepartment of Genetics, Wroclaw Medical University, 1 Marcinkowskiego Street, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland.
Mariola IliszkoDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki Street, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland.
Iwona KardaśDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki Street, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland.
Janusz LimonDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki Street, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland.
Beata S Lipska-ZiętkiewiczDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki Street, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland. b.lipska@gumed.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, one of the most common human genomic syndromes, has highly heterogeneous clinical presentation. Patients usually harbor a 1.5 to 3 Mb hemizygous deletion at chromosome 22q11.2, resulting in pathognomic TBX1, CRKL and/or MAPK1 haploinsufficiency. However, there are some individuals with clinical features resembling the syndrome who are eventually diagnosed with genomic disorders affecting other chromosomal regions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the additive value of high-resolution array-CGH testing in the cohort of 41 patients with clinical features of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and negative results of standard cytogenetic diagnostic testing (karyotype and FISH for 22q11.2 locus). Array-CGH analysis revealed no aberrations at chromosomes 22 or 10 allegedly related to the syndrome. Five (12.2 %) patients were found to have other genomic imbalances, namely 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome (MIM#610443), 1p36 deletion syndrome (MIM#607872), NF1 microduplication syndrome (MIM#613675), chromosome 6pter-p24 deletion syndrome (MIM#612582) and a novel interstitial deletion at 3q26.31 of 0.65 Mb encompassing a dosage-dependent gene NAALADL2. Our study demonstrates that the implementation of array-CGH into the panel of classic diagnostic procedures adds significantly to their efficacy. It allows for detection of constitutional genomic imbalances in 12 % of subjects with negative result of karyotype and FISH targeted for 22q11.2 region. Moreover, if used as first-tier genetic test, the method would provide immediate diagnosis in ∼40 % phenotypic 22q11.2 deletion subjects.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, MultipleChromosome DeletionChromosome DisordersChromosome DuplicationChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6Comparative Genomic HybridizationDiGeorge SyndromeEye AbnormalitiesFaciesFemaleHearing LossHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansHypertelorism17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome22q11.2 deletion syndromeArray comparative genomic hybridizationchromosome 6p25.3p25.2 deletionNAALADL2NF1 microduplication syndrome

Identifiers

PMID27629806
PMCPMC5243916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.