Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2017
Psychosocial Features of Clinically Relevant Patient Subgroups With Serious Mental Illness and Comorbid Diabetes.
Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations among comorbid anxiety, psychiatric symptomatology, and diabetic control in a population with serious mental illness and diabetes: Findings from an interventional randomized controlled trial.International journal of psychiatry in medicine · 2018Trial
- Association of Depression and Anxiety with Social Network Types: Results from a Community Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Population segmentation of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and its clinical applications - a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCare for people with serious mental illness and diabetes is complicated by clinical heterogeneity. This cross-sectional analysis of 200 individuals with comorbid serious mental illness and diabetes explored differentiation between patient subgroups that were characterized on the basis of selected dimensions within a biopsychosocial framework.
methodsRelationships between self-efficacy, treatment expectation, social support, and depression were first assessed via bivariate Spearman correlations among 200 individuals participating in a randomized controlled trial who had diabetes along with major depression, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. Next, latent profile analyses were conducted to determine underlying subgroups on the basis of these variables. The resultant groups were compared on diabetes control, function, and symptoms.
resultsTwo subgroups emerged. One had more severe psychiatric symptoms, low scores on other psychosocial variables, and worse diabetes control. The other had low levels of psychiatric symptoms, better scores on other variables, and better diabetes control.
conclusionsSymptom presentation and internal and external resources appeared to be related to diabetes control for people with comorbid diabetes and serious mental illness. Care approaches need to go beyond standard education and consider biopsychosocial variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.