For family physicians, by family physicians?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The person, not just the problem.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
   Article
2. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
   Article
3. Knowledge mobilization for primary care: Lessons learned from 40 years of the Rourke Baby Record.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
   Article
4. Guidelines in family practice-help wanted.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
   Article
5. Response.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016
   Article
6. Why primary care guidelines are not prepared by family physicians.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016
   Article
7. Response.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Why primary care guidelines are not prepared by family physicians.2016
• Commented on by
  Response.2016
• Commented on by
  Response.2016

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as