Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27629638›Full record

ReviewNature2016

The coming of age of de novo protein design.

Po-Ssu Huang, Scott E Boyken, David Baker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 609 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
609citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

609 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Design-Evolution Synergy Enables New-to-Nature Enzyme Chemistry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Scalable Production of aPharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. AbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Beyond native sequence recovery: Improved modeling of the sequence-energy landscape of protein structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

549 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Po-Ssu HuangDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Scott E BoykenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are 20(200) possible amino-acid sequences for a 200-residue protein, of which the natural evolutionary process has sampled only an infinitesimal subset. De novo protein design explores the full sequence space, guided by the physical principles that underlie protein folding. Computational methodology has advanced to the point that a wide range of structures can be designed from scratch with atomic-level accuracy. Almost all protein engineering so far has involved the modification of naturally occurring proteins; it should now be possible to design new functional proteins from the ground up to tackle current challenges in biomedicine and nanotechnology.

Indexed as

Drug DesignBiophysicsComputational BiologyNanostructuresProtein FoldingProteinsProtein StabilityProteins

Identifiers

PMID27629638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.