ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2017
An interval prototype classifier based on a parameterized distance applied to breast thermographic images.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast thermography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in women. Because of this, thermographic images have received a refocus for diagnosing this cancer type. This work proposes an innovative approach to classify breast abnormalities (malignant, benignant and cyst), employing interval temperature data in order to detect breast cancer. The learning step takes into account the internal variation of the intervals when describing breast abnormalities and uses a way to map these intervals into a space where they can be more easily separated. The method builds class prototypes, and the allocation step is based on a parameterized Mahalanobis distance for interval-valued data. The proposed classifier is applied to a breast thermography dataset from Brazil with 50 patients. We investigate two different scenarios for parameter configuration. The first scenario focuses on the overall misclassification rate and achieves 16 % misclassification rate and 93 % sensitivity to the malignant class. The second scenario maximizes the sensitivity to the malignant class, achieving 100 % sensitivity to this specific class, along with 20 % overall misclassification rate. We compare the performances of our approach and of many methods taken from the literature of interval data classification for the breast thermography task. Results show that our method outperforms competing algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.