Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27629406›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Nutrient intakes and nutritional biomarkers in pregnant adolescents: a systematic review of studies in developed countries.

Katie Marvin-Dowle, Victoria Jane Burley, Hora Soltani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The importance of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation: lifelong consequences.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Vitamin D in Fertility and during Pregnancy and Lactation: A Review of Clinical Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katie Marvin-DowleCentre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Victoria Jane BurleySchool of Food Sciences and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Hora SoltaniCentre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. H.Soltani@shu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9611-6777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBabies born to adolescent mothers have been shown to have poorer outcomes compared to those born to adults. Nutritional status may have an important role to play in improving the health of pregnant adolescents; however there is a lack of evidence regarding the adequacy of adolescent diets during pregnancy. This systematic review aims to examine what is known about the nutritional status of adolescent pregnant women.

methodsA systematic search of the literature identified 21 studies which met the inclusion criteria for the review. Primary research papers using any methods were included where they were published in English between January 1995 and May 2015 and included measurements of nutrient intakes or biological markers of nutritional status in pregnant women aged 11-19 years. Individual study data was first summarised narratively before study means were pooled to give an estimate of nutritional status in the population.

resultsThe results show that individual studies reported intakes of energy, fibre and a number of key micronutrients which were below recommended levels. Biological markers of iron and selenium status also showed cause for concern. Pooled analysis of individual means as a percentage of UK Dietary Reference Intakes showed intakes of vitamin D (34.8 % CI 0-83.1) to be significantly below recommendations (p = 0.05). Serum selenium levels were also found to be low (61.8 μg/L, CI 39-84).

conclusionsThis review has identified a number of areas where the nutritional status of pregnant adolescents is sub-optimal, which may have implications for the health of adolescent mothers and their babies. It was not however possible to examine the impact of supplement use or socio-demographic characteristics which limits the interpretation these results. Further work is needed to establish the characteristics of those most at risk within this population, how this differs from adult pregnant women and the role of supplementation in achieving adequate nutrition.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusAdolescentBiomarkersDietEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalnutritionPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy in AdolescenceRecommended Dietary AllowancesBiomarkersAdolescentNutritionPregnancySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27629406
PMCPMC5024513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.