Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27629122›Full record

ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2016

The state of "freeze-for-all" in human ARTs.

Natalia Basile, Juan A Garcia-Velasco

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04597463 (The Combination of Endometrial Injury and Freeze All Strategy in Women With a History of Repeated Implantation Failure.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04597463 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The Combination of Endometrial Injury and Freeze All Strategy in Women With a History of Repeated Implantation Failure.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensRan2017 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsEndometrial Injury, Hysteroscopy, Repeated Implantation FailuresArmsEndometrial injury
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia BasileIVI-Madrid, Rey Juan Carlos University, Av del Talgo 68, 28023, Madrid, Spain.
Juan A Garcia-VelascoIVI-Madrid, Rey Juan Carlos University, Av del Talgo 68, 28023, Madrid, Spain. juan.garcia.velasco@ivi.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent development of vitrification technologies and the good outcomes obtained in assisted reproduction technologies have supported new indications for freezing and segmentation of treatment. Beyond OHSS prevention and avoidance of embryo transfers in the setting of an adverse endocrinological profile or endometrial cavity, we have witnessed a trend to shift fresh embryo transfers to frozen embryo transfers in many programs. We critically review the available evidence and suggest that freeze-all is not "for all," but should be individualized.

Indexed as

CryopreservationReproductive Techniques, AssistedVitrificationEmbryo TransferHumansFreeze-allLow respondersOHSSPerinatal outcomePGSSegmentationVitrification

Identifiers

PMID27629122
PMCPMC5171894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.