ArticleEMBO reports2016
Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing: The use of genome editing technologies in plant breeding requires a novel regulatory approach for new plant varieties that involves farmers.
Article in EMBO reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hotter, drier, CRISPR: the latest edit on climate change.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Review
- Shotguns vs Lasers: Identifying barriers and facilitators to scaling-up plant molecular farming for high-value health products.PloS one · 2020Article
- Global developments of genome editing in agriculture.Transgenic research · 2019Article
- Meeting report of the OECD conference on "Genome Editing: Applications in Agriculture-Implications for Health, Environment and Regulation".Transgenic research · 2019Article
- Worldwide CRISPR patent landscape shows strong geographical biases.Nature biotechnology · 2019Article
- The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019Article
- An EU Perspective on Biosafety Considerations for Plants Developed by Genome Editing and Other New Genetic Modification Techniques (nGMs).Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Plants Developed by New Genetic Modification Techniques-Comparison of Existing Regulatory Frameworks in the EU and Non-EU Countries.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
- Recovering the Original Intentions of Risk Assessment and Management of Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018Article
- New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.GM crops & food · 2017Review
- A Universally Acceptable View on the Adoption of Improved Plant Breeding Techniques.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.