Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27629031›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Muscle-spring dynamics in time-limited, elastic movements.

M V Rosario, G P Sutton, S N Patek, G S Sawicki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanical control: parallel pathways for modulating movement.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Jumping Kinematics and Performance in Fighting CricketsBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. RNAi of the elastomeric protein resilin reduces jump velocity and resilience to damage in locusts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Optimal Gearing of Musculoskeletal Systems.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Tunable, Simplified Model for Biological Latch Mediated Spring Actuated Systems.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A physical model of mantis shrimp for exploring the dynamics of ultrafast systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M V RosarioDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA michael_rosario@brown.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9969-6746
G P SuttonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK.
S N PatekDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
G S SawickiJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Raleigh, NC 27514, USA.
Duke University · USUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle contractions that load in-series springs with slow speed over a long duration do maximal work and store the most elastic energy. However, time constraints, such as those experienced during escape and predation behaviours, may prevent animals from achieving maximal force capacity from their muscles during spring-loading. Here, we ask whether animals that have limited time for elastic energy storage operate with springs that are tuned to submaximal force production. To answer this question, we used a dynamic model of a muscle-spring system undergoing a fixed-end contraction, with parameters from a time-limited spring-loader (bullfrog: Lithobates catesbeiana) and a non-time-limited spring-loader (grasshopper: Schistocerca gregaria). We found that when muscles have less time to contract, stored elastic energy is maximized with lower spring stiffness (quantified as spring constant). The spring stiffness measured in bullfrog tendons permitted less elastic energy storage than was predicted by a modelled, maximal muscle contraction. However, when muscle contractions were modelled using biologically relevant loading times for bullfrog jumps (50 ms), tendon stiffness actually maximized elastic energy storage. In contrast, grasshoppers, which are not time limited, exhibited spring stiffness that maximized elastic energy storage when modelled with a maximal muscle contraction. These findings demonstrate the significance of evolutionary variation in tendon and apodeme properties to realistic jumping contexts as well as the importance of considering the effect of muscle dynamics and behavioural constraints on energy storage in muscle-spring systems.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaGrasshoppersMovementMuscle, SkeletalRanidaeTendonselastic energy storagefixed-end contractionmuscle dynamicsmuscle–spring interactionspring stiffnesstime-limited loading

Identifiers

PMID27629031
PMCPMC5031668
OpenAlexW2519786442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.