Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27629027›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Untangling the environmental from the dietary: dust does not matter.

Gildas Merceron, Anusha Ramdarshan, Cécile Blondel, Jean-Renaud Boisserie, Noël Brunetiere, Arthur Francisco, Denis Gautier, Xavier Milhet, Alice Novello, Dimitri Pret

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
84.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Changing perspectives on early hominin diets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gildas MerceronInstitut de Paléoprimatologie et Paléontologie Humaine: Evolution et Paléoenvironnements UMR 7262, CNRS and Université de Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France gildas.merceron@univ-poitiers.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5777-7126
Anusha RamdarshanInstitut de Paléoprimatologie et Paléontologie Humaine: Evolution et Paléoenvironnements UMR 7262, CNRS and Université de Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France.
Cécile BlondelInstitut de Paléoprimatologie et Paléontologie Humaine: Evolution et Paléoenvironnements UMR 7262, CNRS and Université de Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France.
Jean-Renaud BoisserieInstitut de Paléoprimatologie et Paléontologie Humaine: Evolution et Paléoenvironnements UMR 7262, CNRS and Université de Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France Centre Français des Études Éthiopiennes USR 3137, CNRS and Ministère des Affaires Étrangères, Ambassade de France en Ethiopie, PO Box 5554, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Noël BrunetiereInstitut Pprime UPR 3346, CNRS, ENSMA and Université de Poitiers, 86962 Futuroscope Chasseneuil Cedex, France.
Arthur FranciscoInstitut Pprime UPR 3346, CNRS, ENSMA and Université de Poitiers, 86962 Futuroscope Chasseneuil Cedex, France.
Denis GautierFerme Expérimentale du Mourier, Institut de l'Elevage, 87800 St Priest Ligoure, France Centre Interrégional d'Information et de Recherche en Production Ovine, Ferme Expérimentale du Mourier, 87800 St Priest Ligoure, France.
Xavier MilhetInstitut Pprime UPR 3346, CNRS, ENSMA and Université de Poitiers, 86962 Futuroscope Chasseneuil Cedex, France.
Alice NovelloDepartment of Biology and the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Dimitri PretIC2MP UMR 7285, CNRS and Université de Poitiers, 86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de l’Elevage · FRUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both dust and silica phytoliths have been shown to contribute to reducing tooth volume during chewing. However, the way and the extent to which they individually contribute to tooth wear in natural conditions is unknown. There is still debate as to whether dental microwear represents a dietary or an environmental signal, with far-reaching implications on evolutionary mechanisms that promote dental phenotypes, such as molar hypsodonty in ruminants, molar lengthening in suids or enamel thickening in human ancestors. By combining controlled-food trials simulating natural conditions and dental microwear textural analysis on sheep, we show that the presence of dust on food items does not overwhelm the dietary signal. Our dataset explores variations in dental microwear textures between ewes fed on dust-free and dust-laden grass or browse fodders. Browsing diets with a dust supplement simulating Harmattan windswept environments contain more silica than dust-free grazing diets. Yet browsers given a dust supplement differ from dust-free grazers. Regardless of the presence or the absence of dust, sheep with different diets yield significantly different dental microwear textures. Dust appears a less significant determinant of dental microwear signatures than the intrinsic properties of ingested foods, implying that diet plays a critical role in driving the natural selection of dental innovations.

Indexed as

DustTooth WearAnimalsDietFemaleFoodMolarSheepSwineDustcontrolled-food trialsdental microwear texture analysisdietdustgrittooth wear

Identifiers

PMID27629027
PMCPMC5031653
OpenAlexW2518721283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.