ArticleNeuroinformatics2017
SpineCreator: a Graphical User Interface for the Creation of Layered Neural Models.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Reproducibility and Rigour in Computational Neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- Curated Model Development Using NEUROiD: A Web-Based NEUROmotor Integration and Design Platform.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2019Article
- Abstract concept learning in a simple neural network inspired by the insect brain.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- GPUs Outperform Current HPC and Neuromorphic Solutions in Terms of Speed and Energy When Simulating a Highly-Connected Cortical Model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Integrating Brain and Biomechanical Models-A New Paradigm for Understanding Neuro-muscular Control.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Code Generation in Computational Neuroscience: A Review of Tools and Techniques.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Review
- A computational model of the integration of landmarks and motion in the insect central complex.PloS one · 2017Article
- Striatal Neuropeptides Enhance Selection and Rejection of Sequential Actions.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing requirement in computational neuroscience for tools that permit collaborative model building, model sharing, combining existing models into a larger system (multi-scale model integration), and are able to simulate models using a variety of simulation engines and hardware platforms. Layered XML model specification formats solve many of these problems, however they are difficult to write and visualise without tools. Here we describe a new graphical software tool, SpineCreator, which facilitates the creation and visualisation of layered models of point spiking neurons or rate coded neurons without requiring the need for programming. We demonstrate the tool through the reproduction and visualisation of published models and show simulation results using code generation interfaced directly into SpineCreator. As a unique application for the graphical creation of neural networks, SpineCreator represents an important step forward for neuronal modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.