Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27628532›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2016

Corticospinal and transcallosal modulation of unilateral and bilateral contractions of lower limbs.

Jakob Škarabot, Ruben Perellón Alfonso, Neil Cronin, Jure Bon, Vojko Strojnik, Janne Avela

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bilateral deficit in maximal force production.European journal of applied physiology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jakob ŠkarabotNeuromuscular Research Centre, Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, PL 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland. jakob.skarabot@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0118-1216
Ruben Perellón AlfonsoDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Neil CroninNeuromuscular Research Centre, Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, PL 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Jure BonDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vojko StrojnikLaboratory of Kinesiology, Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Gortanova ulica 22, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Janne AvelaNeuromuscular Research Centre, Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, PL 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInterhemispheric inhibition may play a role in the expression of bilateral deficit in force (BLD). This study investigated whether the degree of BLD is reflected in the nature of interhemispheric interaction during unilateral and bilateral contractions.

methodsSubjects divided into three groups, 'bilateral' (n = 7), 'unilateral' (n = 5) and 'control' (n = 8), performed unilateral and bilateral maximal voluntary isometric knee extensions while receiving electrical stimulation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation of the target and ipsilateral muscles. Main variables of interest included peak force for subsequent calculation of bilateral index, voluntary activation level (VAL), motor evoked potential amplitudes (MEPs) and silent period durations (SPs).

resultsBLD was noted only for the whole sample (p = 0.009), but not for any of the groups. VAL was significantly higher during bilateral compared to unilateral contractions (~97 vs. 92 %, p = 0.023), with no differences between groups. MEPs of target and ipsilateral muscles were significantly bigger during bilateral contractions (p = 0.042 and p = 0.022, respectively), with no differences between groups. No differences in SPs were observed.

conclusionsHigher values of MEPs and VAL during bilateral contractions, in conjunction with unaltered SPs, do not support the concept of inhibition related to BLD, but rather suggest the possibility of cortical facilitation. Based on the existing literature, this behavior may be specific to the lower limb musculature, but the possibility of sub-cortical or higher-order neural alterations cannot be excluded.

Indexed as

Corpus CallosumCortical ExcitabilityDominance, CerebralHumansIsometric ContractionKnee JointMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalNeural InhibitionPyramidal TractsYoung AdultBilateral deficitCorticospinal excitabilityInterhemispheric inhibitionInter-limbMotor controlTMSTranscallosal modulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.