Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27628523›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2016

'Pre-endoscopy point of care test (Simtomax- IgA/IgG-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide) for coeliac disease in iron deficiency anaemia: diagnostic accuracy and a cost saving economic model'.

Michelle Shui Yee Lau, Peter Mooney, William White, Victoria Appleby, Sulleman Moreea, Ismail Haythem, Joshua Elias, Kiran Bundhoo, Gareth Corbett, Liam Wong and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02834429 (Pre-endoscopy Serological Testing for Coeliac Disease - a Novel Approach Using Rapid Antibody Testing.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02834429 completednot on this map

Pre-endoscopy Serological Testing for Coeliac Disease - a Novel Approach Using Rapid Antibody Testing.

TypeobservationalSponsorSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRan2010 to 2017Enrolled1,596ConditionsCeliac Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle Shui Yee LauAcademic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK. michellelau@doctors.org.uk.
Peter MooneyAcademic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
William WhiteAcademic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
Victoria ApplebyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Sulleman MoreeaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
Ismail HaythemDepartment of Gastroenterology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK.
Joshua EliasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Kiran BundhooDepartment of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Gareth CorbettDepartment of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Liam WongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Her Hsin TsaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Simon CrossAcademic Unit of Pathology, Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
John HebdenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
Sami HoqueDepartment of Gastroenterology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK.
David SandersAcademic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBBradford Royal Infirmary · GBHull Royal Infirmary · GBWhipps Cross University Hospital · GBNorthern General Hospital · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational guidelines recommend coeliac serology in iron deficiency anaemia, and duodenal biopsy for those tested positive to detect coeliac disease. However, pre-endoscopy serology is often unavailable, thus committing endoscopists to take routine duodenal biopsies. Some endoscopists consider duodenal biopsy mandatory in anaemia to exclude other pathologies. We hypothesise that using a point of care test at endoscopy could fill this gap, by providing rapid results to target anaemic patients who require biopsies, and save costs by biopsy avoidance. We therefore assessed three key aspects to this hypothesis: 1) the availability of pre-endoscopy serology in anaemia; 2) the sensitivities and cost effectiveness of pre-endoscopy coeliac screening with Simtomax in anaemia; 3) whether other anaemia-related pathologies could be missed by this targeted-biopsy approach.

methodsGroup 1: pre-endoscopy serology availability was retrospectively analysed in a multicentre cohort of 934 anaemic patients at 4 UK hospitals. Group 2: the sensitivities of Simtomax, endomysial and tissue-transglutaminase antibodies were compared in 133 prospectively recruited patients with iron deficiency anaemia attending for a gastroscopy. The sensitivities were measured against duodenal histology as the reference standard in all patients. The cost effectiveness of Simtomax was calculated based on the number of biopsies that could have been avoided compared to an all-biopsy approach. Group 3: the duodenal histology of 153 patients presenting to a separate iron deficiency anaemia clinic were retrospectively reviewed.

resultsIn group 1, serology was available in 361 (33.8 %) patients. In group 2, the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100 % and 100 % for Simtomax, 96.2 % and 98.9 % for IgA-TTG, and 84.6 % and 96.4 % for EMA respectively. In group 3, the duodenal histology found no causes for anaemia other than coeliac disease.

conclusionSimtomax had excellent diagnostic accuracy in iron deficiency anaemia and was comparable to conventional serology. Duodenal biopsy did not identify any causes other than coeliac disease for iron deficiency anaemia, suggesting that biopsy avoidance in Simtomax negative anaemic patients is unlikely to miss other anaemia-related pathologies. Due to its 100 % NPV, Simtomax could reduce unnecessary biopsies by 66 % if only those with a positive Simtomax were biopsied, potentially saving £3690/100 gastroscopies.

trial registrationThe group 2 study was retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov. Trial registration date: 13(th) July 2016; TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02834429 .

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyBiopsyCeliac DiseaseCost SavingsDuodenumFemaleGastroscopyGliadinHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GMaleGliadinImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GPeptidesCoeliac diseaseDiagnostic testsEndoscopyHealth economicsHistopathologyIron deficiency anaemiaScreeningSmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID27628523
PMCPMC5024457
OpenAlexW2520524070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.